|
CSS - Css A:link In Multiple Places
hello all
i'm kind of new in CSS, so i'm with some questions regarding the way i can using it. For example, at the moment i d'like to have diferent link colors in the same page. Is it possible? how? I have seen the a:link option but applies only to whole page. thank in advance Similar TutorialsI am trying to edit a CSS that was set up by someone else - never done this before, using Dreamweaver. I wanted the links to be a darker blue on baykeeper DOT org, so I changed the code in both homepage.css and subpage.css, the two style sheets for our website. There appears to be only one place to specify link color in each style sheet: a:link { color: #004B91; text-decoration: none; } a:visited { color: #004B91; text-decoration: none; } a:active { color: #004B91; text-decoration: none; } a:hover { text-decoration: underline; If you look at baykeeper DOT org/index.html which is drawing from homepage.css, only the main content has dark blue links. The side column does not. On any other page (drawing from subpage.css) the links are still the same color. I have checked in the .css files and refreshed the pages but clearly I'm missing something... My questions a 1. Is there some other way to set link color in CSS? I don't see any other places where I could change the color, but maybe I don't know where to look. 2. I had a similar problem with the favicon - I updated the template but it didn't apply to all the pages equally. Why is that? Is there some way to refresh individual pages' connections to the templates? Mysterious to me. 3. Once I figure this stuff out, the bottom nav links will be invisible because the darker blue will blend in - so that's a location where I *want* the link color to be different (white). How do I control the link color in different sections of the layout? Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. I'm trying to set up multiple link style schemes , but it works in IE, not in Firefox? In Firefox in a.link does same as a.intro:link. What do I do, what's wrong? a:link { color: #006600; text-decoration: underline; font-weight: bold; } a:visited { color: #006600; text-decoration: underline; font-weight: bold; } a:hover { color: #FFFFFF; background-color: #66CC00; } a.intro:link { font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; color: #FFFFFF; background-color: #000000; } a.intro:visited { font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; color: #FFFFFF; background-color: #000000; } a.intro:hover { font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; color: #FFFFFF; background-color: #8DCB2E; } Is it possible to have multiple link classes? Currently, I'm using the pseudo elements a:link, a:visited, etc., but there are a couple of places in my layout where the colors for these links are the same color as my background. Is there any way that I can single out certain links using classes and set their colors to a different color like #ffffff Thank you in advance, Jim I've set-up a few link colrs in a style sheet - I see it working in mac IE, and Safari - but not IE in windows. Most of the formatting is being ignored. I'm going to try setting all attributes (link, visited, hover...) for each set but that seems like a reach. any ideas? the link: http://www.eightbyten.com/rc_store/shopcart_test.html the style sheet directly: http://www.eightbyten.com/rc_store/link.css Thanks! I'm building a site that will have a style sheet that should be applied site wide (main.css) and then some pages will have styles that should only be applied to them (custom<X>.css). Should I use multiple <link> tags to import each stylesheet or should I edit custom<X>.css and add @import "main.css"; to the beginning. Doing this would make the code look cleaner, but will the browser still cache the main.css file? Am I being too persnickety about the look of my code and just use multiple <link>s? I want to create a schema for different colored links. I'm stumped because I am pretty sure my syntax is correct, but it's not working correctly. I have created a class called "add" but my links in add are still showing up as the default. A portion of my css: Code:
a.add:link{
color: #FFFFFF;
text-decoration: none;
}
a.add:visited {
color: #0000FF;
}
a.add:hover {
color: white;
text-decoration: underline;
}
My link using "add": Code:
<a class="add" onclick="window.open('add_tnosc_password.jsp', 'window_one');" style="cursor:hand">Add</a>
Hi all, I'm a newbie to CSS but I'm giving it a good crack and trying to learn all I can, reading and experimenting etc. I'm currently building a website for my wife's cake baking business and can't seem to get multiple CSS link classes working and I don't know why. I've been reading various websites on CSS for the last couple of hours but honestly can't see what I've done wrong. Any help would be appreciated. If you look at the site Ladybirdbakery co uk the top navigation has a .top_nav class that makes it white and the links are supposed to turn yellow and underline when you hover but they just don't. Similarly the small print links at the bottom, the mailto link underlines but the external link to my marketing website doesn't. I've tried re-writing the CSS a few times and put it through the W3 validation and it doesn't pull up any errors on my link classes that seem to be causing this issue. Could anyone offer me some advice so I can get this right and not make the same mistakes in the future? The CSS lives at the above address /ladybird.css Thank you very much. Ant hey all, i am trying to implement coolmenus dropdown menus on a site but i am having problems. In IE it is fine it is in the rght place, but in mozFF it is positioned at the top of the page wierd here is the CSS for it which i think is possibly the problem Code:
/* CoolMenus 4 - default styles - do not edit */
.clCMAbs{position:absolute; visibility:hidden; left:0; top:0}
/* CoolMenus 4 - default styles - end */
/*Style for the background-bar*/
.clBar{position:absolute; top:auto; width:10; height:10; background-color:yellow; layer-background-color:yellow; visibility:hidden}
/*Styles for level 0*/
.clLevel0,.clLevel0over{position:absolute; padding-top:3px; font-family:georgia; font-size:12px; font-weight:bold; text-align:center; }
.clLevel0{background-color:#667138; layer-background-color:#667138; color:#ffffd2;}
.clLevel0over{background-color:#A4AA54; layer-background-color:#A4AA54; color:#ffffd2;; cursor:pointer; cursor:hand; }
.clLevel0border{position:absolute; visibility:hidden; background-color:#667138; layer-background-color:#667138}
/*Styles for level 1*/
.clLevel1, .clLevel1over{position:absolute; padding:2px; font-family:georgia; font-size:11px; text-align:center;}
.clLevel1{background-color:#667138; layer-background-color:#667138; color:#ffffd2;}
.clLevel1over{background-color:#A4AA43; layer-background-color:#A4AA54; color:#ffffd2; cursor:pointer; cursor:hand; }
.clLevel1border{position:absolute; visibility:hidden; background-color:#A4AA54; layer-background-color:#A4AA54}
/*Styles for level 2*/
.clLevel2, .clLevel2over{position:absolute; padding:2px; font-family:tahoma,arial,helvetica; font-size:10px; font-weight:bold; text-align:center;}
.clLevel2{background-color:Navy; layer-background-color:Navy; color:white;}
.clLevel2over{background-color:#0099cc; layer-background-color:#0099cc; color:#667138; cursor:pointer; cursor:hand; }
.clLevel2border{position:absolute; visibility:hidden; background-color:#006699; layer-background-color:#006699}/* CSS Document */
i can get it right in FF by changing this value in the javascrpt Code: oCMenu.fromTop=0 //this works for IE oCMenu.fromTop=139 // This works for Moz FF i can't get both correct at the same time! I am trying to position this menu in a DIV on my page which has the settings Code:
#TitleBar {
position:absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
padding: 15px;
padding-left:10px;
width:100%;
/* For IE5/Win's benefit height = [correct height] + [top padding] + [top and bottom border widths] */
height:170px; /* 14px + 17px + 2px = 33px */
border-style:solid;
border-color: #A4AA54;
border-top: 1px #A4AA54 solid;
border-bottom: 1px #A4AA54 solid;
border-width:1px 1px; /* top and bottom borders: 1px; left and right borders: 0px */
background-color:#A4AA54;
background-image:url(../images/logo/gglogo.JPG);
background-position: 1% 2px;
background-repeat:no-repeat;
z-index:0;
/* This is a fix for IE% */
voice-family: "\"}\"";
voice-family:inherit;
height:170px;
width:100%; /* the correct height */
}
/* "be nice to Opera 5" */
body>#TitleBar {height:170px; width:100%;}
if anyone can help me with this that would be great!! i have posted on the dhtml coolmenus forumy thing but i dont think it is very active, certainly not as good as devshed thanks in advanced RF Help! Could someone please have a look at the website I'm making at brandnewcommunicatie.nl/mall? Problem is: I've created a simple table to display text and an image next to eachother. However, the textcolumn is under the image. I'm posting it here, because I'm fairly certain it's a CSS related problem. Probably some value in my CSS that isn't right. I just don't see it, after staring at the code for hours. I'd really appreciate it if someone can figure this one out Hello, I have a page with a large table. The problem is that when you print the page, the browser will add a page break in the middle of a row. I would like to force no-page-breaks for each row, so when you print, it will never print half a row on one page and the other half on the next page. I am assuming css can do this, but I have no idea where to start. I can look up the specifics, can someone just point me in the right direction? It is possible (although support seems sketchy) to prevent tables from breaking: Quote: table {page-break-inside: avoid;} BUT... the css definitions don't seem to apply to non-block-elements (such as tr and th). Although the CSS validator does not seem to complain, most browsers don't seem to support it. This feature seems to important to have been neglected by WC3, so what am I missing? My final option (and I shutter to think about it) is to place a non-breaking table inside each row. That seems (to me) very silly, but perhaps it is a way around the problem. It has an additional problem that the td breaks won't line up. The table won't lok much like a table anymore. I am looking for a much happier solution. Thanks PROBLEM: I create a nice button using the sliding doors technique for rounded corners. But the button displays with 100% width unless I float it. My layout requires that the buttons be inline with the text, so floating won't work. Anyone know an alternative? I wouldn't mind floating but I want the button to show inline with the text. When I use float:left, it removes it from the inline flow. Basically, I want a very modular button that can be used in several different places on a page. In many cases, floating is fine because the mockup has it out of the inline text, but I want to use it there, too. Here's the HTML: <a class="button" href="#"><span>Update Profile</span></a> Here's the css: a.button:link, a.button:visited { background:url(button_right.gif) no-repeat right top; } a.button span:hover, a.button span:active { background:url(button_left_hover.gif) no-repeat right top; } a.button span { background:url(button_left.gif) no-repeat left top; color:#fff; cursorointer; display:block; height:20px; line-height:20px; margin:0 2px 0 0; padding:0 10px; position:relative; white-space:nowrap; } http://tinyurl.com/5llwfl I'm having some problems with this page in particular. Try clicking on one of the Left or Right white image arrows below the main picture. This only occurs in Firefox 2.x. Once you click the link, the content area below "Starting from $278.497" should shift roughly 5 pixels down. I thought it may be related to the dotted link outline that surrounds the image, but that was not the case. I applied styles to get rid of that and there was no changes. I also thought it may be related to a position:relative; bug which this site has been notorious for. I tried making certain divs in that area position:relative to no avail. So to test further I tried an overall #content *{position:relative;} fix which could not fix the position shift, either. I'm not sure what else it could be. And while I do have access to the build of this app, I have not been able to reproduce the issue by downloading all HTML, CSS, and image files locally. Hello Is there a way i can restore my <a href> link back to its original color, that is before the a:visited event, when I click on another link? PS. no Javascript code needed, is their an alternative in css? I have my links defined with a dashed border, but I don't want this on linked images and I'm trying to figure out if I can accomplish this with CSS only without additional markup in my HTML file. Here is a sample file: http://www. shawkey.com/test/imagebordertest.html Any suggestions on how I can get the dashed border to not appear below the image and only appear below the text with just CSS? Hello is there a way to make it so hyperlinks are not decorated as the default blue? I have the following css which I've attempted to make it so the text '.com' is always white, but it defaults to the standard link color. html: <td class="nodecoration"><a class="nodecoration" href="http://www.somesite.com">.com</a></td> css: Code:
td.nodecoration {
background-color: #003399; color: white; width: 120px; height: 30px; font-family: "Verdana", sans-serif; font-size: 25px; font-weight: bold; text-align:center;
}
A:link.nodecoration {text-decoration: none}
A:visited.nodecoration{text-decoration:none}
A:active.nodecoration{text-decoration:none}
a:hover.nodecoration{text-decoration:underline}
I would like to have multiple id and all using hover link for all #test1, #test2, #test3, #test4 a:hover{ color:#0F0; } this doesn't work. NOT sure why?? thanks Hello! I'm gonna try to keep this as simple as I can, I don't know css at all... I have a site where I'm gonna feature trailers in Quicktime and I'm planning on using a script called clearbox to open these trailers. Go to my site and view the trailers to see what clearbox is. Now, to my problem. I'm gonna have 20 trailers per page, but all the trailers are not the same size. If you check out the trailers on my site you can see that the close button for the Pirates 2 trailer is a bit off, as to the National Treasure trailer where the button is where it's supposed to be. That's because the trailers are in different sizes, and the boxes/windows also are in different sizes. To change the position of the close button, I have to edit the clearbox.css file. What I'm getting at is that I must have one clearbox.css file for each trailer/window and that every clearbox.css file needs an id or something so I can call it from within the html/php file. Here's the code for clearbox as I have right now on my site. First up is the code I have within the head section... Code: <link href="piratesofthecaribbean2/css_trailer/clearbox.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <script src="piratesofthecaribbean2/js/clearbox.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <link href="nationaltreasure/css_trailer/clearbox.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <script src="nationaltreasure/js/clearbox.js" type="text/javascript"></script> And here are the links for the "View trailer"-buttons... Code: <a href="piratesofthecaribbean2/trailer.php" rel="clearbox(668,,330,,click)"><img border="0" src="http://www.jbfans.com/images/linkfilms_viewtrailer-normal.jpg" class="domroll http://www.jbfans.com/images/linkfilms_viewtrailer-hover.jpg" width="124" height="27"></a> Code: <a href="nationaltreasure/trailer.php" rel="clearbox(668,,342,,click)"><img border="0" src="http://www.jbfans.com/images/linkfilms_viewtrailer-normal.jpg" class="domroll http://www.jbfans.com/images/linkfilms_viewtrailer-hover.jpg" width="124" height="27"></a> Clearly, this setting doesn't work. What I wanna know is if I can have multiple clearbox.css files with different settings (to suit each trailer/window) and if I can call these clearbox.css files in this link: Code: <a href="nationaltreasure/trailer.php" rel="clearbox(668,,342,,click)"><img border="0" src="http://www.jbfans.com/images/linkfilms_viewtrailer-normal.jpg" class="domroll http://www.jbfans.com/images/linkfilms_viewtrailer-hover.jpg" width="124" height="27"></a> I hope someone understands what I want, I really want this to work! Thanks in advance! Based on CSS, on a static XHTML-written site, can multiple languages be used? And can they be user-switchable? Thanks, Chris Ok. So after some one i don't know on a website i was reading told me i should replace my tables with CSS i decided to listen to them. Now the website's top bar should look like this: http://www.leeksoftware.co.uk And i decided to do each box as a DIV. BUT! I can't get them all in a line. I can get the yellow one to the right of the long one but then i cant get the rest in the line. So far the CSS is: Code:
div.logo
{
height: 70px;
width: 618px;
background-color: #476cD9;
float: left;
}
div.home
{
height: 70px;
width: 100px;
background-color: #E29942;
margin-left: 619px;
float: left;
}
div.soft
{
height: 70px;
width: 100px;
background-color: #CC3333;
margin-left: 719px;
}
div.tuto
{
height: 70px;
width: 100px;
background-color: #006666;
margin-left: 819px;
}
div.cont
{
height: 70px;
width: 100px;
background-color: #254D78;
margin-left: 919px;
}
I tired adding float left to all of them but that made them go diagonal. Can any one help? Thanks Matt Hi, I'm trying to use multiple classes: div class="class1 class2". As usual, IE 6 does all but not what you would expect. Please allow me to post a code snippet: Code:
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
.class1 {
background-color: red;
}
.class2 {
background-color: green;
}
.class1.class2 {
background-color: yellow;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="class1">
.class1 -- should be red
</div>
<div class="class1 class2">
.class1.class2 -- should be yellow
</div>
<div class="class2">
.class2 -- should be green
</div>
</body>
</html>
Sadly, the rule for .class1.class2 is also applied to the third div, where it should clearly NOT apply, so it is yellow instead of green. I know that using subclasses "is not safe for IE", as is CSS in general -- but is there a workaround that doesn't force me to abandon the technique? Thank you, answers appreciated! |
|||||||