HTML - Alternative To <p>&nbsp;</p> >

UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">

 

Navigate Network BigResources.com BoxedArt.com StockedPhotos.com Built2go.com 123Webmaster.com A1Javascripts.com 1-Click-Clipart.com FresherImage.com FontFiles.com HTMLforums.com httpCITY.com PerlAccess.com HostRaiders.com



 
Website Templates
All access to thousands of web templates, logos, icons, more...


Turnkey Websites
Instant websites, turnkey PHP templates!


Stock Photography
All access to thousands of professional stock photos


CMS Templates
100's of templates for joomla, drupal, wordpress, and more!


 





  HTML Forums - Free Webmaster Forums and Help Forums > WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT > HTML / XHTML Webpage won't work when I upload to server! User Name: Password:
  Remember Me?
      View Poll Results:      
  0% Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll
    View First Unread
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
KEEP TABS
Latest Posts Twitter Network Blog Main RSS Feed SPONSORS
 

   

  Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Hello, I have an image that I want to make "float" above a small green bar, so that it sticks out above it. I have been able to achieve the effect with the <layer> tag, but the problem is that it only displays correctly in Firefox and not in IE. Also, I want to avoid the layer tag since it is not universally supported.

Here is an example with the layers: http://dqnmusic.googlepages.com/indexenlayer.html

Here is what it looks like when I try to avoid layers:
http://dqnmusic.googlepages.com/indexen.html

Is there away around the layer tag that can still achieve the effect I want?

I was wondering...
I really don't want to use Iframes on my website, because everybody tells me they're really unreliable.
What I'm trying to do is make it so that my site navigation code is in a seperate file than the rest of the page, so if I need to update it I don't have to redo fifty-something pages.
I've heard this can be done, but I have no idea how.

I am currently designing a site for my band, we require an mp3 player to be embedded into the site, but dont want the player to be reloaded (and therefore restarted) everytime a new link is visited - basically the music should continue to play no matter what "page" is visited and without interruption. The mp3 player we are using is xspf_player. I am able to use css and html fairly well and have a little experience with php.

I know one way to do it is to put the player in a frame and then all the other content in another frame and just have that frame updating when links are clicked, but I think frames are ugly. Is there any other way I could implement this feature, perhaps using php or css/divs? My thinking was to have all of the content on just one page and have different "sections" becoming visible or invisible but it seems too lengthy for such a simple problem.

Am I just being stupid and overlooking the simplest method?

Thanks in advance,
Matt

I have a website build with frames. I have a section called "News" that I want to be able to put the most updated news in, similar to a blog. I want a blog style interface, that way I don't have to edit the HTML of the page every time I want to add a new piece of news. I do not want an SQL based blog however. I've looked into some PHP based blogs, but it "looks" too much like another website loading inside this frame (which I know it IS, but I don't want to give that appearance).

My website is *White* so is there a solution to adding new news in a blog style format without an entire blog inside the frame? I just want to be able to easily add new news to an HTML page without actually going in an editing the HTML.

How do other websites deal with adding news to a news page so that a client could easily edit their own news? Thanks!

Hi - so I'm a bit of a noob to all this html business, but have done a bit of C at uni. Basically I'm embarking on a little home project trying to create a notepad web app- that way i can have it in my bookmarks, as an app on my iphone, as a webclip on my mac's dashboard etc. I'm hosting it from my dropbox, got that bit sorted.
I thought I had it sorted when i found contenteditable, but alas no ios support, so I was wondering if anyone new of an alternative, basically all i want is a text box thats editable, a save and a refresh button.

Any help greatly appreciated,
Thanks,
Geoff.

First, people were saying *frames* were bad for a lot of reasons... *then*...they were saying iframes were bad...for the same reasons!

So..if frames and iframes are so bad, what is the alternative that has the same functionality as frames and iframes (parts of the screen can change *and* scroll, controlling one side with the other like a 'menu' on the left and 'contents' on the right which changes).

i was just told that frames are not good to use... i was wondering what a good alt to frames was

Hello there,
I am wondering if there is a free alternative to Adobe InContext Editing out there. One that people have had experience with and believe to be credible.
I would really appreciate it if you could point me in the right direction.
Thanks for your time.

Trying to see if someone has a work around for this. I have a vbulletin forum with a shoutbox and I would like to move the shoutbox to a page outside of the forum. I did this before with an iframe when I had phpbb3 but have not been able to do this with vbulletin.

I now have the shoutbox on an external page but it still contains the header and footer and I have not found a way to remove these. I just need the actual shoutbox approx 730px by 350px. Is there a way to pull only the specific area of a page to another page?

*****Edit Resolved *********

Hello,

I am currently making a vBulletin skin, and was wondering if there were any alternative to overflow: auto? The thing is, I'm trying to create a sidebar without tables AND with a fluid wrapper.

My CSS code looks like this:
Code:

#wrapper {
 width: 90%;
 min-width: 980px;
 margin: 10px auto 0 auto;
 background: #1a1a1a url(images/magnetic/style/wrapper.png) repeat-x top left;
 border: 1px solid #161616;
 overflow-x: hidden;
 -moz-border-radius: 8px 8px 8px 8px;
 -webkit-border-bottom-left-radius: 8px;
 -webkit-border-bottom-right-radius: 8px;
 -webkit-border-top-left-radius: 8px;
 -webkit-border-top-right-radius: 8px;
}

#right-content {
 float: right;
 width: 275px;
 color: #7a7a7a;
 padding: 15px 0;
}

#left-content {
 margin: 0px 0 0 0;
 background: #e9ecee url(images/magnetic/style/bg-main.gif);
 padding: 0px;
 min-height: 800px;
 overflow: auto;
 overflow-x: hidden;
 -moz-border-radius: 8px 8px 8px 8px;
 -webkit-border-bottom-left-radius: 8px;
 -webkit-border-bottom-right-radius: 8px;
 -webkit-border-top-left-radius: 8px;
 -webkit-border-top-right-radius: 8px;
}

And here's what the HTML looks like:
Code:

<div id='wrapper'>

        <div id='right-content'>

Right content (sidebar) here

        <!--end right--></div>

            <div id='left-content'>

The left content here

            </div>
</div>

The thing is, when the overflow:auto is there, the page looks fine BUT it has issues when opening, for example, dropdown menu or expanding a big image.

Here's what it does when opening a dropdown menu:


Here's what it does when trying to open an image:
http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/9...340problem.gif

So what I'm trying to do, is to create a fluid layout with a right sidebar without tables. It's working, although I'm looking for some code modifications so it doesn't have issues with the dropdowns etc. Basically, it seems that everything looks fine BUT when we open something that is "larger" than the #left-content ID. Then it creates issues.

Any idea?

Thank you so much in advance.