|
JavaScript - Dynamically Add Functions To Other Function
Hi everyone,
i thought about following code snippet: Code:
var newfunc = function() {
//...
}
func = (function (oldfunc,newfunc) {
return function () {
oldfunc();
newfunc();
}
}(func || function(){},newfunc))
There is a function "func" and with the above method i want to add a new function "newfunc" to this function, so when i call "func" in the futur, both functions will be executed. It works good, but suppose i want to add multiple functions to func, each time with the described method...could there be a problem with the stack? As far as i understand, the program creates something like a wrapper-function each time, that contains the two functions it combines. So in the case of adding 3 functions, a call of "func" would lead to this: call "wrapper 2", call "wrapper 1", call func1, call func2, call func3, call func 4. The really poor graphic should illustrate what i mean __________ F1|....|....| __|W1|....| F2|....|....| __|___|W2| ...|F3 |....| ...|___|___| ..........| F4| ..........|___| Has anyone an idea, if my thoughts on that are correct oder if this behaviour could be a problem? And is there probably a better way to combine functions, so that all functions would be in one column? Thanks and Greetings! moon-safari Similar TutorialsHi everyone, I am pretty new to JS and I am looking for help writing a function that will dynamically calculate filed values. I have a PHP-generated form which may have a varying number of fields. I need to: 1. calculate the line total for each row -- unitprice * units = linetotal 2. calculate total of all linetotals. I have named my fields as follows: unitprice[1], unitprice[2]... , units[1], units[2], ... I have the following calculate function: Code: function calculateOld() {
// get both values
unitprice = document.forms["invoice"].unitprice.value;
units = document.forms["invoice"].units.value;
// do some calculation
lineTotal = formatNumber((unitprice * units), 2);
// set the value in the right field
document.forms["invoice"].linetotal.value = lineTotal;
unitprice2 = document.forms["invoice"].unitprice2.value;
units2 = document.forms["invoice"].units2.value;
if(unitprice2 != '') {
// do some calculation
lineTotal2 = formatNumber((unitprice2 * units2), 2);
// set the value in the right field
document.forms["invoice"].linetotal2.value = lineTotal2;
document.forms["invoice"].totalprice.value = formatNumber((parseFloat(lineTotal) + parseFloat(lineTotal2)),2);
}
else {
document.forms["invoice"].linetotal2.value = '';
document.forms["invoice"].totalprice.value = formatNumber(lineTotal,2);
}
}
This does calculate what I need but only if I have up to two rows. I need to make the function dynamically count how many rows there are, and calculate the linetotal for each row. And here's where my limited JS knowledge brings me to a halt. I have been thinking about what this new and dynamic function should look like, but that's the best I could produce... Code: function calculate() {
var unitprice[i] = document.forms["invoice"].unitprice[i].value;
var units[i] = document.forms["invoice"].units[i].value;
var linetotal[i] = formatNumber((unitprice[i] * units[i]), 2);
return linetotal;
}
Your help will be appreciated. Please explain how things are done, don't just give me the code. Thanks in advance! Hi all, I have a set or icons that which over time I replace with a different icon and and add a onclick event to them. This is my code Code: function updateStatusIcons(retText) {
updatingStatuses = true;
var updates = retText.split("|");
for (z=0; z<updates.length; z++) {
var sysId = trim(updates[z].split(":")[0]);
var projectId = trim(updates[z].split(":")[1]);
if (projectId != "") {
var statusImg = getSysidsImg(sysId);
statusImg.src = "images/tick.gif";
statusImg.className = "hand";
statusImg.title = "Project "+ projectId +" created, Click here to find in project search";
statusImg.onclick = function () { document.location = "projectSearch-FTTC.jsp?initAction=loadproject&projectId="+ projectId; };
// Remove sysid from csv
removeSysidfFromCSL(sysId);
}
}
if (pollingOn) {
pollingupdate = setTimeout("checkForProjectComplete()", 5000);
}
updatingStatuses = false;
if (runErrorFunction) {
markErrors();
}
}
Everything works fine except for the onclick event. In the hover message of the icon, the correct project ID is displayed in the message, hoever in the function, the onclick funtion always loads the page with the last set project id. How can I pass the project id into the onclick function and make it stay fixed and not be the value of that it was last set to? TIA, Dale Note: major noobage here I'm sure... but can't seem to figure this out... How do I make these three functions into one script? Much love if you can help! Code: <script type="text/javascript">
setTimeout('yourFunction();', 2500);
function yourFunction(){
document.getElementById('hide').style.display='block';
}
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
setTimeout('yourFunction2();', 8000);
function yourFunction2(){
document.getElementById('hide').style.position='fixed';
}
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
setTimeout('yourFunction3();', 8500);
function yourFunction3(){
document.getElementById('hide').style.margin='0 -310px';
}
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
setTimeout('yourFunction4();', 15500);
function yourFunction4(){
document.getElementById('hide').style.margin='0 610px';
}
</script>
Hi, I would like to do something like this: Code: function searchLocations(count) {
var found = false;
var input = document.getElementById('autocomplete').value;
var inp = input.toLowerCase();
var count = 0;
for (var j = 0; j < gmarkers.length; j++) {
gmarkers[j].hide();
var str=gmarkers[j].myname.toLowerCase();
var patt1=inp;
if (str.match(patt1))
{
found = true;
gmarkers[j].show();
count++;
}
}
if (count==1)
myclick(j);
if (count>1)
centerZoom();
if ( ! found ) alert("No matches found. Please check your spelling or refine your search.");
}
on this page here, but the functions - myclick(j); and centerZoom(); aren't getting called. I tried it with switches here, but that only made things worse. I know the functions work because if I put them two } up, they get called, but that takes them out of the if statements. Those if (count...) statements have to be where they are so that "count" will get the right value. Any ideas? Is it possible to make a variable available to other functions outside a function So to make it global from within a function without using a callback Code: function() {
var something = 'hello';
}
function(something) {
document.write(something);
}
something like that possible?? Hello, Our website is built in ASP.NET and uses a content management system. The CMS came with a wealth of JavaScript files and I decided to use one of these files for form validation. Although the file is over 2,300 lines, from what I can tell it is supposed to return true if the form is valid and false otherwise. The problem is that a function inside that file seems to get to a certain point, and somehow quit and return true no matter if the form is valid or not. I am calling this JS from an ASP.NET button control. When the button is clicked, a JS function ValidateForm(document.forms[0]) is called. My ValidateForm function calls another function inside the JS file (which calls another, and another...). No matter what, when that second function is called and executed, code execution stops at some point and the form submits (postbacks). I can see that the validation is working just before the postback, but it is not preventing the form from being submitted, and it also stops executing any code after it. Here is my code: ASP: Code: <asp:Button ID="SubmitBtn" runat="server" Text="Submit Form" CausesValidation="false" CssClass="submit_button" OnClientClick="FmValidate(document.forms[0]); return false;" OnClick="SubmitBtn_Click" /> My Javascript: Code: function FmValidate(formObj) {
var strError = ''; var e = null;
if (strError == '' && 'function' == typeof design_validateHtmlForm) {
alert('before');
// this line causes execution to stop - located in external JS file
// code states "Returns first invalid element, or null."
e = design_validateHtmlForm(formObj);
alert("e is " + e);
if (e) { strError = e.title; }
return false;
}
}
In my ASP.NET button, changing the OnClientClick method to "return false" will prevent form submission, but "return FmValidate(formObj);" will not if that function calls design_validateHtmlForm(formObj). I receive the message box saying "before" but I never receive the second one. I have debugged using Fire bug, but the code seems to cycle through each element on the page and stepping through the code is not realistic (I have done so for 20-minute stretches). I am wondering if anyone has any ideas what code I could look for that would stop execution and return true no matter what, or how I could begin debugging this monster. Hey all, I am confused about the true difference between the two below examples. Code: first example:
// Demonstrating a problem with closures and loops
var myArray = [“Apple”, “Car”, “Tree”, “Castle”];
var closureArray = new Array();
// Loop through myArray and create a closure for each that outputs that item
for (var i = 0; i < myArray.length; i++) {
var theItem = myArray[i];
closureArray[i] = function() {
document.write(theItem + “ < br / > ”);
}
}
// Loop through the closures and execute each one.
for (var i = 0; i < closureArray.length; i++) {
closureArray[i]();
}
Here we iterate through the length of myArray, assigning the current index of myArray to theItem variable. We declare closureArray 4 times as an anonymous function. The anonymous function in turn declares the predefined write() function, which is passed parameters. Since write() is in closureArray() a closure is created??? During each iteration, theItem is reassigned its value. The four closures reference this value. Since they reference this same value and since this value is reassigned ultimately to the value of the fourth index position, tHe time we execute closureArray later on, all four closures output the same string. This is because all four closures are within the same scope "the same environment" and therefore are referencing the same local variable, which has changed. I have a couple of problems with this example: 1) I thought a closure is a function that is returned - the inner function is not returned above. 2) theItem is not even a local variable of the parent function (closureArray) - I thought in order for a closure to work, the inner function only accesses the local variables of the outer function, but in this case the local variable is defined OUTSIDE of the parent function. 3) The guy says the "the four closures are sharing the same environment." The thing is even in the second example, they are sharing the same environment. Second example: Code: // A correct use of closures within loops
var myArray = [“Apple”, “Car”, “Tree”, “Castle”];
var closureArray = new Array();
function writeItem(word) {
return function() {
document.write(word + “ < br / > ”);
}
}
// Loop through myArray and create a closure for each that outputs that item
for (var i = 0; i < myArray.length; i++) {
var theItem = myArray[i];
closureArray[i] = writeItem(theItem);
}
// Loop through the closures and execute each one.
for (var i = 0; i < closureArray.length; i++) {
closureArray[i]();
}
Here we iterate over the length of myArray (4 times), assigning the index of myArray to theItem variable. We also return a function reference to the closureArray during each iteration (closureArray[i]), where i is index number so we assign 4 functon references. So when we iterate through myArray, we immediatelly call the writeItem() fucntion passing an argument of theItem at its current value. This returns a child anonymous function and when that child function is called, it will execute a block that calls the predefined write() method. We assign that returned anonymous function to the variable closureArray. Hence, closureArray holds a reference to that anonymous function. So closureArray during each iteration holds a reference to the anonymous function and we later call closureArray, which in turn calls the anonymous function, therefore calling the predefined write() function to output the local variable of the parent function. This outputs each distinct index of myArray. QUESTION: This is because since we created the closure, when we call writeItem, passing theItem argument, since theItem is a local variable of the parent function of the closure, it is never destroyed when we later call closureArray (the reference to the child anonymous function)? Yet weren't we using a closure in the first example as well? So whey wasn't those variables preserved? I don't think it has anything to do with assigning a returned anonymous function to closureArray. Even though an anonymous function creates a new memory position in the javascript engine, therefore not overwriting the other function references we create during the iteration, it's still referring to a local variable declared outside the reference. So if it's about the closure retaining value of parent's local variable even after exiting the parent function allowing for the current indexes to be preserved, then why did the closure in the first example fail to retain each index? Thanks for response I am trying to display some images in, say, 500ms intervals, but I want to loop through images, so I use a for loop and setTimeouts and function calls... Code: for (i=0;i<=5;i++)
{
setTimeout(DisplayTheImage, 500);
}
(a var that increments the image like image[x] is somewhere else) but I think all I accomplish is that while the above code calls the function 5 times alright, all five function calls occur simultaneously. Right? Eh, I want the function to be called 5 times, but at five different times, namely in 500ms intervals. I thought the function would wait to finish (500 ms) then another call and so on. How can I do that? Hi, I have written a number of functions designed to return frequency data on 1000 randomly chosen numbers using different math functions for the rounding. I would like to include all of these functions within the wrapper of another function so that only one call is needed to get returns from all of the 'inner' functions. However, while each of the functions works in isolation, the moment I wrap them in another function they stop working. The following code is one of the functions 'frequencyWrapperOne' that has been wrapped in the function 'testWrapper'. A call to testWrapper does nothing. Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong? Code: function testWrapper()
{
function frequencyWrapperOne()
{
var numberArrayOne = new Array(0,0,0);
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i = i + 1)
{
var chosenNumber = Math.floor(Math.random() * 3);
if (chosenNumber == 0)
{
numberArrayOne[0] = numberArrayOne[0] + 1;
}
if (chosenNumber == 1)
{
numberArrayOne[1] = numberArrayOne[1] + 1;
}
if (chosenNumber == 2)
{
numberArrayOne[2] = numberArrayOne[2] + 1;
}
}
return window.alert(numberArrayOne.join(','));
}
}
testWrapper();
Thanks. Is there a way to activate a function from another function? It has to be in the script tag, it can't be in the HTML section. Can I use something similar to this following code? If not, can anyone give me some help? I have tried to do it various ways, and have looked it up a few times, but to no avail. Can I use something similar to this following code? If not, can anyone give me some help? if (condition) {activate functionname();} Any help I can get would be appreciated. Thanks a lot to anyone who can help. Ok here is what I have so far, my ending part of my Call Function I think is ok. for my main function. I think I misplaced the { and } I will show you all the codes I have for my main function this is what I have I think I did misplace something but I can not pin point where that one small things should be Code: unction showResults(race,name,party,votes)
{ // script element to display the results of a particular race
var totalV = totalVotes(votes);
document.write("<h2>" + race + "</h2>");
document.write("<table cellspacing='0'>");
document.write("<tr>");
document.write("<th>Candidate</th>");
document.write("<th class ='num'>Votes</th>");
document.write("<th class='num'>%</th>");
document.write("</tr>");
}
for (var i=0; i < name.length; i++)
{
document.write("<tr>");
document.write("<td>" name[i] + "(" + party[i] + ")</td>");
document.write("td class='num'>" + votes[i] + "</td>");
var percent=calcPercent(votes[i], totalV)
document.write("<td class='num'>(" + percent +"%)</td>");
createBar(party[i],percent)
document.write("</tr>");
}
document.write("</table>");
}
</script>
Just wondering if i misplaced any ; or { or } anywhere suggestions? Here is my call function Code: <script type="text/javascript"> showResults(race[0],name1,party1,votes1); showResults(race[1],name2,party2,votes2); showResults(race[2],name3,party3,votes3); showResults(race[3],name4,party4,votes4); showResults(race[4],name5,party5,votes5); </script> I been going over this, I can not seem to figure out what { i might be missing? Thanks note: this is not homework Hi all, Currently I am doing this: Code: var e = document.getElementById('id');
e.style.color = '#ff0000';
e.style.fontFamily = 'sans-serif';
e.innerHTML = time;
...blah blah...
What I'm actually doing is inserting the current time into an existing DIV and updating it every second. THAT all works. What I want to do is also set an event for that div.... something like this: e.event.onclick = 'runThisCode()'; Of course, the above doesn't work... and I'm not even sure what to ask for doing a Google search... because I get no hits (or maybe it's not possible). So, is it possible, and if so, how? Thanks! -- Roger p.s. I really don't want to edit the code itself (where that div is) because it's part of another app that may change as they update it and I don't want to have to re-patch every new release. ok i have a script which will make a copy of the html in a div and place it into another div the problem with this it creates a duplicate element with the same id so what i want to know is can i create a new id based off old ids using a generic type script Code: function scope(e)
{
var popin = document.getElementById('popin');
popin.innerHTML = "<div class='container'>"+e.innerHTML+"</div>";
popin.style.display = "block";
}
this code is designed for taking content in a small div and placing it into a larger div to increase the viewing area so what i would need is sumthing that can look for Code: id="sum text" and maybe amend it to Code: id="sum textP" or sumthing to that extent if sum1 could point me in the right direction that would be great if my post is not clear enough just ask me to be more specific or sumthing and i will see what i can do to try and make it more clear if needed hello, I'm trying to load the ads on my site dynamically and have ran into an issue and was hoping for some help. First - I can get the ads to load using vanilla javascript with the code below. Code: var ifrm = document.createElement("iframe");
ifrm.setAttribute("src", OAS_url + "adstream_sx.ads/" +sitePage + "/" + uniqid() + "@" + pos);
var ifrmId = "ifrm_" + uniqid();
ifrm.setAttribute("id", ifrmId);
ifrm.setAttribute("marginwidth", 0);
ifrm.setAttribute("marginheight", 0);
ifrm.setAttribute("frameborder", 0);
ifrm.setAttribute("scrolling", 0);
ifrm.setAttribute("height", container.scrollHeight + (container.offsetHeight - container.clientHeight));
ifrm.setAttribute("width", container.scrollWidth + (container.offsetWidth - container.clientWidth));
container.appendChild(ifrm);
But since the site is using jquery I wanted to develop it out that way. So I have the following code, Code: iRandom = oas.uniqid();
sAdURL = opt.url + 'adstream_mjx.ads/' + opt.sitepage + '/1' + iRandom + '@' + sPos + '?' + opt.query;
$('<iframe />', {
src: sAdURL,
id: sPos
}).appendTo(thisAd);
I figured the reason this isn't working is the difference between appendChild and appendTo and the fact that things are jquery objects. So again the top code block renders the ads and the lower code block just shows the javascript code from the ad provider. Any help to get this to work in jquery would be grateful. Thanks Hi Guys, I am using the following bit of code to toggle information inside a webpage. Is there a way i can make this code more dynamic so that i do not have to use the next() function to initiate slidetoggle()? I would like to have it so i can pass an ID through to the function and it will then toggle my box but i can't figure it out. Javascript is not my strong suite. Here the function Code: function initMenu() {
//$('.items_wrapper').hide();//object to be hidden
$('.headline').click(//object to be clicked
function() {
$(this).next().slideToggle('slow');
//alert("doesn't work");
}
);
}
$(document).ready(function() {initMenu();});
I would like to create a link inside .headline such as .ViewItems If you need to see the code let me know and i will post it. --EDIT-- Right Now my code is like this and you click headline Code: <div class='headline'></div> <div class='items_wrapper'> </div> I would like it work with an internal element like this, so i can't use next() Code: <div class='headline'><div class='selector'>Click Here</div></div> <div class='items_wrapper'> </div> Thanks in advance. I have an input box "product" besides it there is an add input button which adds another input box product upon clicking.This array of input boxes I have created is through document.createElement('input'). My autocomplete is working for the initial input box....now when I click add Input button for the generated box also the autocomplete shld work...how do I make it work?? PS:Autocomplete script is working so I didnt post it here.... I just want it to make it working dynamically created i/p boxes Hi, I would just like to know how I would dynamically add another table once text fields in the existing table is clicked on. So pretty much what I have is a table with 5 textboxes lined up horizontally in the first row along with couple of buttons in the second row. What I want is that once one text box is clicked, another table like the one above is created and appears below that initial table. So this is the inital table that should be replicated on each click: Code: <table> <tr> <td><input type="text" /></td> <td><input type="text" /></td> <td><input type="text" /></td> <td><input type="text" /></td> <td><input type="text" ></td> </tr> <tr> <td><button /></td> <td><button /></td> </tr> </table> How would I go about achieving this? Thanks My overall challenge is to make up for what I consider to be a design flaw in how Google Ad Manager works. What I am trying to accomplish is create a way for an advertiser to randomly rotate through whichever ad formats are available, rather than get locked into a particular ad slot location. This has required several steps, most of which I've been able to work out by myself, and now I'm down to what I expect is the last big issue. Because Google Ad Manager pairs up the highest priority advertiser with the first loaded ad slot script, the most important task was to randomize the load order of the scripts. Doing this, however, necessitates pairing up those scripts with the appropriate space set aside for them on the page, more or less after the fact. The code I'm having trouble with is the part where I try to move the node containing the active script to the its desired location and is showing just about every permutation of result except the one that I want, depending on browser. Code: var moveithere = document.getElementById(newmodid); moveithere.appendChild(divinloader[i]); moveithere.appendChild(scriptelement[i]); Not surprisingly, IE breaks as soon as it gets to this point and nothing happens with the divinloader[i] node OR the scriptelement[i] node - I have seen some references that it's not likely to like this and perhaps some recommendations about how to handle it, so I'm not too concerned about that just yet. Firefox doesn't throw any kind of an error, but neither does the scriptelement[i] node do anything at all, even though the divinloader[i] node migrates to where I want it. Chrome comes the closest to working - the script runs, but not in the location that I want. Although I don't expect it's been an exhaustive search, I have tried a number of other approaches and this one has seemed to get me the closest to the desired result with the simplest coding. As to what's currently acceptable coding and what's not, I won't pretend to have a clue. To see the full code in action, what it does, what I'm trying to do and to check for errors (likely) or offer suggestions on how I could get there more easily just use the following - I've substituted simpler code so that you don't have to pull down the actual Google Ad Manager scripts but it seems to work exactly the same and shows what I'm trying to do anyway. Hopefully there aren't any unnecessary artifacts still present. Code: <html>
<head>
<title>Testing arrayed dynamic randomized script loading</title>
</head>
<body>
<!-- PUT THIS TAG IN DESIRED LOCATION OF SLOT ATFRectangle-Main
-->
<div id="atfrectangle-outer"> Tell 'em TIO sent you (rectangle) <div id="atfrectangle-inner">
</div> </div>
<!-- END OF TAG FOR SLOT ATFRectangle-Main
-->
<!-- PUT THIS TAG IN DESIRED LOCATION OF SLOT ATFWideSkyscaper-Main
-->
<div id="atfwideskyscaper-outer"> Tell 'em TIO sent you (skyscaper)<div id="atfwideskyscaper
-inner">
</div></div>
<!-- END OF TAG FOR SLOT ATFWideSkyscaper-Main
-->
<!-- PUT THIS TAG IN DESIRED LOCATION OF SLOT FullBanner-Main
-->
<div id="fullbanner-outer"> Tell 'em TIO sent you (banner)<div id="fullbanner-inner">
</div></div>
<!-- END OF TAG FOR SLOT FullBanner-Main
-->
<h1>Load up the array with ad formats</h1>
<script type = "text/JavaScript">
// create an array to hold information about the various ad formats
var adformat = new Array();
// load the array with the appropriate ad format data
adformat[0] = "FullBanner";
adformat[1] = "ATFRectangle";
adformat[2] = "ATFWideSkyscaper";
// make a notation about what is coming next (and show successful conclusion of previous
steps)
document.write("<h2>Order for the ad formats as loaded into the array</h2>");
// declare the variable to use for counting
var i = 0;
// begin looping through as many times as needed to go through entire array and write out
each ad format
for (i in adformat) {
document.write("<p>" + adformat[i] + "<br> </p>");
}
// end loop for writing out the list of ad formats loaded into the array
// randomize the order of the ad format list
randadload = adformat.sort (function(){
return 0.5-Math.random()
})
// make a notation about what is coming next (and show successful conclusion of previous
steps)
document.write("<h2> Order for the ad formats after randomization</h2>");
// declare the variable to use for counting
var i = 0;
// begin looping through as many times as needed to go through entire array and write out
each ad format in the new list order
for (i in randadload) {
document.write("<p>" + randadload[i] + "<br> </p>");
}
// end loop for writing out the randomized list of ad formats
// make a notation about what is coming next (and show successful conclusion of previous
steps)
document.write("<h2>Creating dynamic module names and script-calling variables</h2>");
// declare variables that might be needed
// create an array to hold module names
modname = new Array();
// create array to hold the names of the google script, partial and full
googscript = new Array();
fullgoogscript = new Array();
// create an array to hold the id to be used for the script loader element
loaderid = new Array();
scriptloaderid = new Array();
// create an array to hold the id for the module
modid = new Array();
// create an array to hold the name of the id for the script inside module
modscriptid = new Array();
// create an array to hold the name of the id for the outer DIV tag
divoutloader = new Array();
// create an array to hold the name of the id for the inner DIV tag
divinloader = new Array();
scriptnodeloader = new Array();
scriptelement = new Array();
// declare the variable to use for counting
var i = 0;
// create a variable to hold the current script number
var scriptnum = 0;
// begin looping through number of elements in the array
for (i in randadload) {
// advance the counter by one increment for each iteration in the loop
scriptnum ++;
// create a script name based on the name of the ad format
googscript[i] = randadload[i] + "-Main";
// change the ad format name to all lower case
loadlc = randadload[i].toLowerCase();
// create a module name based on the name of the ad format
modname[i] = "main" + loadlc;
// create a DIV id name for the loader element based on the name of the ad format
loaderid[i] = loadlc + "_loader";
// create a script id name for the loader element based on the name of the ad format
// scriptloaderid[i] = loadlc + "_scriptloader"'
// create a DIV id name for the inner DIV tag based on the name of the ad format
modid[i] = loadlc + "-inner";
// create a script id name based on the name of the ad format
modscriptid[i] = loadlc + "-script";
//write out all the names just created to check for successful completion and for
accuracy
document.write("<p>Module name is " + modname[i] + " and script name is " +
googscript[i] + " and loader ID is " + loaderid[i] + " and module id is " + modid[i] + "<br>
</p>");
// create a DIV tag to load the script into
divinloader[i] = document.createElement("div");
divinloader[i].setAttribute("id", loaderid[i]);
divinloader[i].style.display="block";
// use the DIV loader to write out the status of the scripts (ultimately hope to LOAD
the scripts)
divinloader[i].innerHTML = "<p>Pretend loading script " + scriptnum + " now... <br>
GA_googleFillSlot(" + googscript[i] + ");" ;
// create the content to be included in the script to be loaded
fullgoogscript[i] = 'document.write("<p> This is actually a real script loading ' +
googscript[i] + ' as a stand-in for a Google script loading " + randadload[i] + "
advertisements.</p>");';
// creating a script element
scriptnodeloader[i] = document.createTextNode(fullgoogscript[i]);
scriptelement[i] = document.createElement("script");
scriptelement[i].type = "text/javascript";
scriptelement[i].setAttribute("id", scriptloaderid[i]);
scriptelement[i].appendChild(scriptnodeloader[i]);
// if this line runs, results in [object HTML scriptelement]
// divinloader[i].innerHTML = scriptelement[i];
newmodid = modid[i];
newmodscriptid = modscriptid[i]
// want to use this to move the script up to its final location
// document.getElementById(newmodid).appendChild(divinloader[i]);
// document.getElementById(newmodscriptid).appendChild(scriptelement[i]);
var moveithere = document.getElementById(newmodid);
moveithere.appendChild(divinloader[i]);
moveithere.appendChild(scriptelement[i]);
}
// end looping through elements in the array
</script>
</body>
</html>
I appreciate any insights you can provide - feel free to call me an idjit if necessary, but please be specific if you do. Thanks, Kimm Hi, I am quite new to JS and is currently building a website with a little of JS Function. Ok, so I have a Page tat consists of 10 images. Each images when on mouse over, will display a larger version on the images, using JS(onmouseover). Then, I will have a next button that will replace all the images, using Ajax, which means my page will not be reloaded. The problem comes here when I have to replace all the onmouseover effect. I can replace all the thumbnails without problem, but the onmouseover I have problem replacing. Is there anyway that I can dynamically replace all the onmouseover? Any help will be appreciated. Thanks I need help, please. How would you write javascript code to check (add tick mark) the checkbox in the below code snippet based on a condition? I have tried using the structu if(x) {document.form.name.checked=true;} but it did not work. I think the checkbox name format below, is a problem. This is all done client-side. Anyone know how to do this? Thanks for any help. Jman Quote: <TABLE id= sec1_sec2_area border=0> <TBODY> <TR> <TD><INPUT id= sec1_sec2_area_0 type=checkbox name= sec1:sec2:area:0><LABEL for= sec1_sec2_area_0>Colors </LABEL></TD></TR> <TR> <TD><INPUT id= sec1_sec2_area_1 type=checkbox name= sec1:sec2:area:1><LABEL for= sec1_sec2_area_1>Size </LABEL></TD></TR> </TBODY></TABLE> |
|||||||