JavaScript - Json Save Arrays, Object
Hey, I'm wondering how do I go about saving an array object in JSON.
I got some help in saving game.money, as you see below in the code. That is something I couldn't figured out on my own even after searching for ages. Now I'm wonder how do I save an array such as game.buildings[0]. It's the same as game.money except it's an array. All inputs are greatly appreciated! Code: function save() { var save = { game: { money: game.money } }; localStorage.setItem("save", JSON.stringify(save)); }; function load() { var GameTwo = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem("save")); if (typeof GameTwo.game.money !== "undefined") game.money = GameTwo.game.money; document.getElementById("money").innerHTML = game.money; }; Reply With Quote 01-19-2015, 06:13 AM #2 Old Pedant View Profile View Forum Posts Supreme Master coder! Join Date Feb 2009 Posts 28,311 Thanks 82 Thanked 4,754 Times in 4,716 Posts Nothing magic about arrays. Use the same code: Code: function saveArray( usingName, anArrayToSave ) { localStorage.setItem( usingName, JSON.stringify(anArrayToSave)); }; function loadArray( nameToLoad ) { return JSON.parse( localStorage.getItem( nameToLoad ) ); } Heck, here's a complete demo: Code: <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <body> <div id="before"></div> <hr/> <div id="after"></div> <hr/> <script type="text/javascript"> function saveArray( usingName, anArrayToSave ) { localStorage.setItem( usingName, JSON.stringify(anArrayToSave)); }; function loadArray( nameToLoad ) { return JSON.parse( localStorage.getItem( nameToLoad ) ); } var foo = loadArray("zamboni"); var div = document.getElementById("before"); if ( foo == null ) { div.innerHTML = "First time"; foo = [ "apples", "bananas", "canteloupe", "dates", "eggplant", "falafel" ]; } else { div.innerHTML = foo.join(","); } foo.sort( function() { return Math.random() < 0.5 ? -1 : 1; } ); div = document.getElementById("after"); div.innerHTML = foo.join(","); saveArray( "zamboni", foo ); </script> </body> </html> Similar TutorialsIgnore post (if mod, please delete)
Hi, I have this ajax routine... Code: function xhr_get(target_str,async){ var sync=true; if(async){sync=false;} var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest(); xhr.open('GET', target_str, sync); if(sync==false){ xhr.onreadystatechange = function () { if (xhr.status === 200) { try{ var ii =JSON.parse(xhr.responseText);} catch (exception) { } if(ii){ return ii; }else{ alert(xhr.responseText); return false; } } else { alert(xhr.status+' '+target_str);return false; } }; xhr.send(null); }else{ xhr.send(null); try{ var ii =JSON.parse(xhr.responseText);} catch (exception) { } if(ii){ return ii; }else{ alert(xhr.responseText); return false; } } } now if I alert(ii) on success the data I am looking for (specifically ii.content) shows up in the alert as expected however when calling from another javascript function, ii is false ???? please explain, Code: function call_change_val(fld,vm_id){ var str='?_f=load_edit_fld&_ctl_fld='+fld+'&vm_id='+vm_id+'&fld='+fld+'&width=80'; i = xhr_get('ajax/val_main_loader.php'+str,true); ////////////////////// alert(i); or alert(i.content) here both give be a blank popup///////////////// showdiv('c_change_'+fld); setih('c_change_'+fld,i.content); } I expected alert(i) to say Object or similar, getting nothing Hi i am confused in one topic and need help, I have a javascript array containing objects like; Object values are ordered as Type, Amount and count. Object 1 => ("A" , 100 ,10) Object 2 => ("C" , 50 ,10) Object 3 => ("A" , 100 ,20) Object 4 => ("B" , 200 ,10) Object 5 => ("A" , 10 ,10) Object 6 => ("B" , 100 ,10) Object 7 => ("C" , 100 ,5) Object 8 => ("C" , 50 ,5) In the end i want to group these objects like ; ("A" , 100,30) (Note : 30 = 20 +10) ("A" , 10,10) ("B" , 200,10) ("B" , 100,10) ("C" , 100,5) ("C" , 50,15) 15 = 10 + 5 How can i do this in javascript, note that the new types will be added to this array ? I have a very large json file, and inside of that json file is an array. I would like to use JavaScript to take that json as an argument, parse through the json and only take certain elements from it and put it into a new json file, below is an example of what I mean: Code: { "contextType": "Account", "preferences": null, "custodianCode": null, "data": [{ "id": "0", "account": "11111111", "field2": true, "field3": false, "field4": "BROK", "field5": "Broker", "field6": "1", "field7": "Cash" },{ "id": "1", "account": "222222222", "field2": true, "field3": false, "field4": "BROK", "field5": "Broker", "field6": "1", "field7": "Cash" }] } And I want to pull from that and get something like this as a new json Code: { "newArray": [{ "id": "0", "account": "11111111", "field2": true, "field3": false, "field4": "BROK", "field6": "1" },{ "id": "0", "account": "222222222", "field2": true, "field3": false, "field4": "BROK", "field6": "1" }] } Also the file is local to my computer and can be outputted locally as well, I am trying to use node.js and JavaScript this is what I have so far Code: var json = require('./simple.json'); var keeperFields = ["id", "account", "field2", "field3", "field4", "field6"]; var newJSON = {newArray: [] }; var i; var fields; for (i = 0; i < keeperFields.length; i++) { for (fields in json) { if (json.hasOwnProperty(keeperFields[i])) { newJSON.newArray.push(keeperFields[i]); } } } console.log(newJSON); This is just a small example the real json file is huge with thousands of lines. Any help or suggestions are appreciated! This current solution is giving me a console log of { newArray: []} instead of the expected result above I need to loop the alphabet and numbers 0-9 to initialize a few thousand arrays. This is for my site and is truly needed. http://www.thefreemenu.com I currently have every array written out and it takes up to much space in my .js file. The majority of my variables are empty but necessary and need to be there (including empty) for my site to work properly. Question is the last part Here's where I'm at. Code: var NewVarLetterOrNum = "a"; eval("_oneofseveralnames_" + NewVarLetterOrNum + "='this part works';"); alert(_oneofseveralnames_a); This creates the variable _oneofseveralnames_a='this part works' Code: var newArrayLetterOrNum = "a"; eval("_oneofseveralnames_" + newArrayLetterOrNum + "= new Array();"); alert(_oneofseveralnames_a) This creates the Array _oneofseveralnames_a=new Array(); and all the values in the array are null, but, now a variable like _nl_a[1]='something' can be used elsewhere because the array exists. This is all that is necessary for now because I can probably set all the variables to be blank with something like Code: i=1 while(i<=20){ _oneofseveralnames_a[i]="1-20"; i++ } alert(_oneofseveralnames_[20]); So now you have what I came to understand in the first few hours. Now to the hard part : ( I can't make multiple array's dynamically. I dont' know if its because I don't understand loops or arrays or what and its very fustrating. As for any answer you might be so kind as to provide, if you could dumb it down that would be greatly appreciated. Code: var newArray =new Array('a','b','c','d','e','f','g','h','i','j','k','l','m','n','o','p','q','r','s','t','u','v','w','x','y','z') i=1 while(i<=26){ eval("_nl_" + newArray[i] + "= new Array();"); i++ } alert(newArray[1]) // Is b, but alert(_nl_b) //I can't get _nl_b to exist, I tried everything including taking away the quotes around the letters in every test */ var _nl_a =new Array() var _img_a =new Array() var _h_a =new Array() var _r_a =new Array() var _m_a =new Array() var _yt_a =new Array() var _i_a =new Array() The above arrays are all the array _name_ parts I need but for example, a has 10 parts, a,p2_a,p3_a,.. p10_a. I need 10 pages for each letter of the alphabet and numbers 0-9 and a special all1, p2_all1 ... p10_all1. Overall 2200 arrays that need to be declared. Currently they are all written out. /* Hi, every time I try and alert: [ { number:0, secondnumber:0 }, { number:2, secondnumber:1 }, { number:1, secondnumber:2 } ] it just shows [object object], [object object], [object object]. Why is this and what can I do to make the record be shown as it is above in an alert? Thanks. I created a method for displaying an object's properties: Code: renderfunction = false; function showProperty (object, property) { document.write ('<td class="type">' + (typeof object[property]) + '</td>' + '<td class="name">' + property + '</td>'); document.writeln('<td class="value">' + ( (typeof object[property] != 'function') ? object[property] :( (property != 'showProperties') ? ( renderfunction ? object[property]() : ('<span class="self">NOT RENDERED</span>') ) : ('<span class="self">THIS</span>') ) ) + '</td>'); document.writeln('<td class="hasOwnProperty" >' + ( object.hasOwnProperty(property) ? "Local" : "Inherited" ) + '</td>'); if (typeof object[property] == 'function') { document.writeln ('<td class="function">' + object[property] + '</td>'); } else { document.writeln ('<td class="function"> </td>'); } } As long as renderfunction = false, the object is fine coming out of this function. However, if I change renderfunction to true, all my properties become undefined. Why isn't this working as I expect it to? How should I fix it? Thanks in advance, -Brian. I can't get any info from Firebug except that one line, uncaught exception [object Object]. The code fully worked, then I needed to make it dynamically create Sortables from the scriptaculous library based on how many X were in a table in my database, which I've done, and I'm thinking it may be a simple slight parse error of some type, I'm not too good with Javascript, because now my script barely works. I've double checked the script's source code, the PHP variables are exactly what they should be. Code: print<<<HERE Sortable.create('sortlist$box', { tag: 'img', overlap:'horizontal',constraint:false, containment: $list, dropOnEmpty: true, onChange: function(item) { var list = Sortable.options(item).element; if(changeEffect) changeEffect.cancel(); changeEffect = new Effect.Highlight('changeNotification', {restoreColor:"transparent" }); }, onDrop: function(item) { var thing=Sortable.options(item).element.identify(); var anchors = document.getElementById(thing).childNodes.length-2; if(anchors > 20){ alert('This box had 20 creatures in it already, your last action has not been saved.'); window.location.reload(); } else{ new Ajax.Request("saveImageOrder.php", { method: "post", parameters: { data: Sortable.serialize("sortlist$box") } }); } } }); HERE; $box++; } ?> }); </script> if you solve this I'll send ya $10 via paypal I'm writing a program that involves a network of interconnected nodes (or simply objects in my example below). It depends on being able to access properties of an object's linked objects (a bit oddly worded, sorry)... Problem is I'm not sure how to properly access those properties... see below please. <script> //This is an example of a problem im having in my own code... //I want to access the name of the object within the links array wintin the object... var objA = {name: "Object A", links: [objB, objC]}; var objB = {name: "Object B", links: [objC, objD, objE]}; var objC = {name: "Object C", links: [objB]}; var objD = {name: "Object D", links: [objE]}; var objE = {name: "Object E", links: [objD]}; //ex: I want to access the name of Object A's first link... console.log(objA.links[0].name); </script> I'm hoping to get "Object B"... But instead I get: TypeError: Result of expression 'objA.links[0]' [undefined] is not an object. Is there another way around this? Any thoughts are appreciated. Hi all, I'm stumped on finding a way in javascript to create an object factory whose instances are also object factories. In short I want something like that below, but no joy ... any clues? Code: function createClass () { return new createClass() function createClass() { return new createInstance () function createInstance () { //Default properties, values and methods which might later be extended } } } var createDoor = createClass(); var door1 = createDoor(); var door2 = createDoor(); var createChair = createClass(); var chair1 = createChair (); var chair2 = createChair (); Hello together! I generate html code with jsp. In that jsp there a several framesets and frames. And yes i know, frames are not really up to date but it's an old program and i have to deal with it now. Anyway, in the top frameset i have an onload attribute like onload="load()". In the function load i want to access the Element.prototype object. But unfortunately typeof Element gives me "undefined". So i looked a little deeper and found that window.toString() gives me "[object]" and not as expected "[object window]" so somehow my window doesn't know that its construcor is Window. window.construcor is "undefined" as well. And i don't have access to the Element object. I really don't know where the error could be. When the page is loaded and i access the same window over the console, then everything is right. But in my function a can't get access to the objects i need. I also don't know what part of the code could be useful to post here, but maybe someone had a similar problem before? i should say that this problem only occurs in IE8. In IE9 it works perfectly. Has anyone any idea?? Hello. Is there any way to get the variable name of an object from inside the object? E.g. PHP Code: function Bla(){ this.write = function(){ document.write(<objectname>); } } obj1 = new Bla(); obj1.write(); //Outputs obj1 Here is my script: PHP Code: function myTimer(seconds, obj){ this.seconds = seconds; this.obj = obj; this.startTimer = function(){ if(this.seconds>0){ this.seconds--; this.obj.innerHTML = this.seconds; this.timer = setTimeout("Timer.start()",1000); } } } Timer = new Timer(10, obj); Timer.startTimer(); Now the problem is that the variable that contains the object must be named "Timer". This way I cannot create new timer objects with different variable names I have tried: this.timer = setTimeout("this.start()",1000); but it doesn't work. That's why it would be good to detect the variable name and instead use something like this: this.timer = setTimeout(varname+".start()",1000); I would rather not have to pass the variable name through a parameter like this: Timer1 = new Timer(10, obj, "Timer1"); Thanks in advance. Quote: menu: function( a, b ) { $( b ).observe( 'click', function( event ) { event.stop(); if( $( a ).visible() ) { $( a ).hide(); $( b ).removeClassName( 'selected' ); document.stopObserving( 'click' ); } else { $( a ).show(); $( b ).addClassName( 'selected' ); document.observe( 'click', function( e ) { if( e.target.id != a && e.target.id != b && !Element.descendantOf( e.target, $( a ) ) ) { $( a ).hide(); $( b ).removeClassName( 'selected' ); document.stopObserving( 'click' ); } }); } }); $$( '#' + b + ' > a' ).each( function( element ) { element.observe( 'click', function( event ) { $( a ).hide(); $( b ).removeClassName( 'selected' ); document.stopObserving( 'click' ); }); }); } This work's perfrect accept when i use it with others on the menu it leaves the other ones open, how do i get it to close the open one when i open a new menu.. Thanks. I am trying to troubleshoot my javascript function below. Code: <script type="text/javascript"> function txtboxfill(fillobj) { var rChar=String.fromCharCode(13); var myVal = "To: " + this.form.to.value + rChar; myVal = myVal + "From: " + this.form.from.value + rChar; myVal = myVal + "Subj: " + this.form.subj.value + rChar + rChar; myVal = myVal + "Message: "; fillobj.value = myVal; } </script> Then I have a text box input field with an Code: <input type="text" id="tp" name="to" size="34" class="totext" onkeyup="txtboxfill(this.form.msg_area);"> and when I enter text in this field it gives me a 'this.form.to' is null or not an object and does not populate the textarea. BTW, msg_area is the id of my textarea. Thank you. Hello all, I thought I'd share something that I don't see talked about much on the forums. I've been doing a bunch of AJAX development at work. We're really strapped for processing speed on our client (we build the machines our clients use) and therefore we've needed to find ways of speeding everything up. One of the things we decided on within the first week of our current project was to completely scrap XML in favor of JSON for sending data back and forth. JSON is JavaScript Object notation. Many of you have already seen it, it looks like this: Code: {'prop1' : 'someValue', 'prop9' : 5}; That defines an object with 2 properties, prop1 and prop9, with the respective values "someValue" and 5. Compare that to XML: Code: <obj> <prop1 value="someValue" type="String" /> <prop2 value="5" type="Integer" /> </obj> That's a bit more bloated, maybe not too noticeable, but the example is a small one. If you take large amounts of data, and multiple objects, XML can get incredibly bloated, and bloat on the wire slows down your app. That's the first reason we switched. The second reason we switched is that we save time on the processing. We all know what it's like to get at XML data. Import the document, get the node, get the value, get the next node, get the value. And building XML documents can take just as long: Create document, create root node, create node, create attribute node, set value, append child, repeat... All that processing for something so simple. JSON on the other hand is a subset of javascript, so check this out. Code: var data = "{'prop1':'someValue', 'prop2':5}"; var obj = eval("(" + data + ")"); alert(obj.prop1); // *** Alerts 'someValue' *** The string fits right into JavaScript in one function call. Granted, eval can be expensive, but if you test this out yourself, it's far cheaper than building and deconstructing XML in the JavaScript engine. There are 2 simple JSON parsing libraries that we use in development: JSON.php and json.js; these provide the necessary functions to serialize any PHP object into JSON, and serialize any JavaScript object into JSON. You can get them at the links below. We are also following the specification for JSON-RPC, defined in the last link below. We found this to be incredibly fast when compared to XML, and we haven't regretted it yet. Granted, we're not doing full blown web services where the the javascript modifies itself based on the service's self-definition, complete with namespaces and function signatures, but we transfer a lot of data quickly and efficiently to provide our users with the best experience possible. I recommend examining this further if you do AJAX development. Hopefully this helped somebody. http://json.org/ http://mike.teczno.com/json.html http://json-rpc.org/ And now for the "VS" part of this post: Anyone with experience in using both XML and JSON that wants to argue the mertis of either technique? I support JSON for almost all AJAX applications currently. I haven't found a good reason to use XML, and the negatives for using XML (bloat and processing speed) have currently knocked it completely from my "viable options" list. Anyone care to discuss? I'm trying to get a return of Code: [ ["red","green","blue"] ,["blue","red","green"] ] from a text file that contains Code: red,green,blue blue,red,green Using the following function Quote: Originally Posted by Old Pedant Code: function WRITE_FILE_AS_JSON(file) { fso = Server.CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject"); myPath=Server.MapPath("timecards/" + file); if(!fso.FileExists(myPath))return; myfile = fso.OpenTextFile( myPath, read); var lines = myfile.readAll().split("\n"); Response.Write("[\n"); for ( var i = 0; i < lines.length; ++i ) { Response.Write(' ' + (i >0 ? ',' : '' ) + '["' + lines(i).replace(/\,/g,'","') + '"]\n'); } Response.Write("]\n"); myfile.Close(); Response.End(); } The darn thing keeps returning Quote: 500 (Internal Server) Error as a result of the line Response.Write(' ' + (i >0 ? ',' : '' ) + '["' + lines(i).replace(/\,/g,'","') + '"]\n'); And I don't know how to fix that line... I've been using the JSON.stringify method to convert my JSON object to a string to pass via AJAX but I've read now that it is not supported in most browsers. What then should I use?
All, Say I have the following code: Code: <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <style>img{ height: 100px; float: left; }</style> <script src="http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.7rc2.js"></script> </head> <body> <div id="images"> </div> <script> $.getJSON("http://api.flickr.com/services/feeds/photos_public.gne?jsoncallback=?", { tags: "cat", tagmode: "any", format: "json" }, function(data) { $.each(data.items, function(i,item){ $("<img/>").attr("src", item.media.m).appendTo("#images"); if ( i == 3 ) return false; }); });</script> </body> </html> This came from the jQuery website. What I would like to do is change the link to something like this: https://graph.facebook.com/me/friend...ss_token=12345 The data that comes back is something like: Code: { "data": [ { "review_comment": "Here is a comment", "id": "12" }, { "review_comment": "Testing With more", "id": "34" }, { "review_comment": "Third comment", "id": "643" }, { "review_comment": "More Comments", "id": "120" }, { "review_comment": "Testing", "id": "3455" } ] } What I would like to do is basically read all of the review_comment tags and basically rotate these to display them on the webpage. So have "Here is a comment" be displayed for like 10 seconds and then fade out and have "Testing with More" fade in and be displayed for another 10 seconds etc. What is the best way to do this? I'm not sure how to change my JSON code above to acheive this. Would I need to basically put the comments in a div and then use jQuery to fade in the divs in and out? Any help you could provide would be greatly appreciated!! hello i am using a json file to import some content into a div like this: Code: $.getJSON('json/main_profile.json', function(data) { $('#info_title').html( '<h1>' + "General Information " + '</h1>' ); }); but the problem appears when i try to replace the json file with a url, like this: Code: $.getJSON("http://interfaces-server.insource.local/users/145198", function(data) { $('#info_title').html( '<h1>' + "General Information " + '</h1>' ); }); why works with the file but not with the link?? thanks I am making a dynamic google map and need to pass in a JS Object that has latitude, longitude, address, name, and a link. The JS Object will be getting those values from a DB and may have up to 15 recordsets. I need to know how to separate that out into it's entities to include in the Map API regardless of how many recordsets there are.
|