PHP - Freaking Out With Session Objects - Can Someone Help?
I have a page in which the print_r ($session) displays the following:
Array ( [securityToken] => 23b1f22bffd9f5097878618da57b14a2 [cartID] => [cart] => shoppingCart Object ( [contents] => Array ( ) [total] => 0 [weight] => 0 [cartID] => [content_type] => [free_shipping_item] => 0 [free_shipping_weight] => 0 [free_shipping_price] => 0 ) [navigation] => navigationHistory Object ( [path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [page] => index [mode] => NONSSL [get] => Array ( [cPath] => 2_9_843_845_852_856_858_863 ) [post] => Array ( ) ) [1] => Array ( [page] => product_info [mode] => NONSSL [get] => Array ( [cPath] => 2_9_843_845_852_856_858_863 [products_id] => 2299 [action] => add_product ) [post] => Array ( ) ) [2] => Array ( [page] => shopping_cart [mode] => NONSSL [get] => [post] => Array ( ) ) [3] => Array ( [page] => checkout_shipping [mode] => NONSSL [get] => [post] => Array ( ) ) [4] => Array ( [page] => checkout_payment [mode] => NONSSL [get] => [post] => Array ( ) ) [5] => Array ( [page] => checkout_confirmation [mode] => NONSSL [get] => [post] => Array ( ) ) [6] => Array ( [page] => checkout_process [mode] => NONSSL [get] => [post] => Array ( ) ) [7] => Array ( [page] => checkout_success [mode] => NONSSL [get] => [post] => Array ( ) ) ) [snapshot] => Array ( ) ) [check_valid] => true [language] => english [languages_id] => 1 [languages_code] => en [currency] => USD [today_is] => 2010-11-26 [updateExpirations] => 1 [session_counter] => 1 [new_products_id_in_cart] => 2299 [valid_to_checkout] => 1 [cart_errors] => [customer_id] => 2 [customer_first_name] => test [customer_default_address_id] => 2 [customer_country_id] => 223 [customer_zone_id] => 2 [customers_authorization] => 0 [messageToStack] => [payment_attempt] => 1 ) What I need to do is loop through the navigationHistory Object , grab the product id, and then get the cPath for that particular product id. I have worked with sessions a lot, but I cannot seem to ever get the session object and loop thing down. At this point I am ripping out my hair trying to figure out what is most likely a simple solution to this - can anyone help me? Similar TutorialsI was told that using a Session will allow me to capture an Object and pass it between pages. I tried following what I read online and what someone sugegsted but it is not working. This is the error I get when running my test application... Quote Catchable fatal error: Argument 1 passed to Microwave::receiveItem() must be an instance of Bowl, instance of __PHP_Incomplete_Class given, called in /Users/user1/Documents/DEV/++htdocs/Soup/cook.php on line 13 and defined in /Users/user1/Documents/DEV/++htdocs/Soup/classes/Soup.class.php on line 31 Call Stack # Time Memory Function Location 1 0.0095 56412 {main}( ) ../cook.php:0 2 0.0101 68272 Microwave->receiveItem( ) ../cook.php:13 I would really appreciate it if someone could look at my code and see where the problem is at. My guess is that it is in cook.php, but who knows?! Attached is a ZIP of my entire directory structure. Thanks, TomTees are you freaking kidding me or am i just gone dead? Code: [Select] if (isset($_COOKIE['subforum'])) { $subforums = ""; }else{ $subforums = " {$info['subforums1']} {$info['subforums']}"; } I fixed the $cookie['subforum'] and added the isset, but now it's saying my subforums1 and subforums are UNDEFINED? Is this a joke? it's not a INPUT it's simply a variable from my DATABASE .... being called? this is my hole heredoc Code: [Select] return <<<EOF <tr $color> <td style=border-left:none><b><span class="forumhover"><a href="{$ibforums->base_url}z={$info['id']}" title='{$info['description']}'>{$info['name']}</a></span> </b> <span class='desc'> $subforums <br></span>$moderator</span></td> <td align='center' nowrap><span class=desc4>Posts:</span> {$info['posts']}<br> <span class=desc4>Topics:</span> {$info['topics']} </td> <td> » <b>{$info['last_topic']}</b></span> <br><span class="forumhover3">{$ibforums->lang['by']} {$info['last_poster']} <span class="desc4">{$info['last_post']}</span> </span> </td> </tr> EOF; ONLY the SUBFORUMS are being UNDEFINED the other $info's like post's,last_posters,last_post ARE NOT Showing errors but the subforums one are? this is literally making me tear my hair out, this is outrageous! any idea why it would do this? pissing me off, I never had to isset those other $info's and it's not calling them as undefined error's but hell whenever I try to code my own mods/etc it always doesn't work the way I want, pathetic, i hate myself and I hate this isset STUFF, does it even effect performance that much? this is just getting ridiclious Hello all!
I have this array of objects:
Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => test [last_name] => test [title] => test [id] => 34 [type] => 4 [manager] => 4 [email] => p@yahoo.com [date] => 2014-09-21 07:23:12 [status] => 2 [approval_date] => 2014-09-21 07:31:10 [assessment_id] => 1 [supervisor_approval] => 1 [manager_approval_date] => 2014-09-21 07:31:27 [mainmanger] => 3 ) [1] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => test [last_name] => test [title] => test [id] => 34 [type] => 4 [manager] => 4 [email] => p@yahoo.com [date] => 2014-09-20 07:39:55 [status] => 2 [approval_date] => 2014-09-20 07:40:41 [assessment_id] => 3 [supervisor_approval] => 1 [manager_approval_date] => 2014-09-20 07:41:07 [mainmanger] => 3 ) [2] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => jimmy john john [last_name] => john [title] => Lorad and Master [id] => 32 [type] => 4 [manager] => 3 [email] => j@j.com [date] => 2014-09-21 07:38:50 [status] => 2 [approval_date] => 2014-09-19 07:39:25 [assessment_id] => 2 [supervisor_approval] => 1 [manager_approval_date] => 2014-09-19 07:39:25 [mainmanger] => 0 ) )Where "id" = the user ID. If there are two or more entries for a user, I want to remove all but the most recent by the "approval_date",... So for the above example it would return: Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => test [last_name] => test [title] => test [id] => 34 [type] => 4 [manager] => 4 [email] => piznac@yahoo.com [date] => 2014-09-21 07:23:12 [status] => 2 [approval_date] => 2014-09-21 07:31:10 [assessment_id] => 1 [supervisor_approval] => 1 [manager_approval_date] => 2014-09-21 07:31:27 [mainmanger] => 3 ) [1] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => jimmy john john [last_name] => john [title] => Lorad and Master [id] => 32 [type] => 4 [manager] => 3 [email] => j@j.com [date] => 2014-09-21 07:38:50 [status] => 2 [approval_date] => 2014-09-19 07:39:25 [assessment_id] => 2 [supervisor_approval] => 1 [manager_approval_date] => 2014-09-19 07:39:25 [mainmanger] => 0 ) )I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around this concept, so I don't have any example code. And I don't really need or expect someone to code this for me,. just a push in the right direction would be awesome. I have the following three tables (and also delta_point and hist_point which are purposely left out and just mentioned for context). Before going down the Doctrine ORM long curvy road, aggrType was just used to restrict possible values so that I didn't need to use MySQL's ENUM, but now I am thinking there may be value to making it an entity and include some methods (and a second reason because I still can't figure out how to make Doctrine create a FK constraint yet not populate the parent entity with a AggrType object). point -id (int PK) -data -dType /* descriminator. Options are AggregatePoint, DeltaPoint, and HistoricPoint */ aggr_point -id (int PK, FK to point) -aggrType (char FK to aggrType) -data aggrType -type (char PK) /* there are about five types */ I have a service to create a new point based on the provided desired type and user data. I don't like the switch statement to determine which type of point to create, but don't know a better way. Also my entity is responsible to provide the appropriate validation rules for the given point type which might not be considered proper but it seems to work for me. Any constructive criticism is welcomed. <?php namespace NotionCommotion\PointMapper\Api\Point; use NotionCommotion\PointMapper\Domain\Entity\Point; class PointService { public function create(string $type, array $params):integer { $class=[ 'aggr'=>'AggregatePoint', 'delta'=>'DeltaPoint', 'hist'=>'HistoricPoint', ][$type]; //$class='Point\\'.$class; //This doesn't seem to be possible and I needed to use the fully qualifed name without the short cut used namespace. $class='\\Greenbean\Datalogger\Domain\Entity\Point\\'.$class; $point=new $class(); $validator=$this->getValidator($point); $params=$validator->sanitize($params); $validator->validate($params); $point->setAccount($this->account); $point->populate($params, $this->em); //Will be addressed later $this->em->persist($point); $this->em->flush(); $point->setIdPublic($this->em->getRepository(Point\Point::class)->getPublicId($point->getId())); return $point->getIdPublic(); } } Now, this is the part I am struggling with the most. I only have one service to create any type of point, so I do wish to put a bunch of if/thens in it and instead move logic to the individual point type being created. The AggrPoint in question requires a sub-point and I don't think it is appropriate to inject the entity manager into a point entity and as an alternative solution find an existing point which is associated with the account which resides in the new AggrPoint. Maybe not appropriate, but it works. This type of point also has a sub-object AggrType as discussed at the very beginning of this post, so I first attempt to create a new one from scratch, but that doesn't work and I need to set $aggrType with an existing one. As an alternative, I passed the entity the entity manager, but as stated I think this is a bad idea. Any recommendations where to go from here? Thank you namespace NotionCommotion\PointMapper\Domain\Entity\Point; class AggregatePoint extends Point { public function populate(array $params, \Doctrine\ORM\EntityManager $em):\NotionCommotion\PointMapper\Domain\Entity\Entity{ $criteria = \Doctrine\Common\Collections\Criteria::create() ->where(\Doctrine\Common\Collections\Criteria::expr()->eq("id_public", $params['pointId'])); if(!$subpoint = $this->getAccount()->getPoints()->matching($criteria)->current()){ throw new \Exception("Invalid subpoint ID $params[pointId]"); } $this->setSubpoint($subpoint); //This won't work since I must use an existing AggregateType and not create a new one $aggrType=new AggregateType(); $aggrType->setType($params['aggrType']); //This just seems wrong and I shouldn't be passing the entity manager to an entity $aggrType=$em->getRepository(AggregateType::class)->findOneBy(['type'=>$params['aggrType']]); $this->setAggregateType($aggrType); unset($params['pointId'], $params['aggrType']); // parent::populate($params) not shown, but it basically calles appropriate setters based on the property name return parent::populate($params); } public function getValidatorRules():array { return $this->filesToArr(['/point/base.json', '/point/aggr.json']); } }
in this page http://maximaart.com/newscp/ i have this problem Code: [Select] Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home/maximasy/public_html/newscp/index.php:1) in /home/maximasy/public_html/newscp/index.php on line 2 my source code is <?php session_start(); include_once("config.php"); include_once("functions.php"); $errorMessage = ''; if (isset($_POST['txtUserId']) && isset($_POST['txtPassword'])) { if ($_POST['txtUserId'] === "$user" && $_POST['txtPassword'] === "$pass") { // the user id and password match, $_SESSION['basic_is_logged_in'] = true; require("main.php"); exit;?> I am having trouble resolving an error. Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home/s519970/public_html/header.php:27) in /home/s519970/public_html/admin/login.php on line 2 What I can gather is I can't use "header (Location: 'admin.php')" after i've used session_start(). I have tried to replace the header (Location: 'admin.php') with this: echo "<script>document.location.href='admin.php'</script>"; echo "<script>'Content-type: application/octet-stream'</script>"; I've been trying to read up on solutions but haven't been able to get it sorted. If anyone can offer some advice that would be greatly appreciated as im new to php. Code: [Select] <?php session_start(); if(isset($_SESSION['user'])) echo "<script>document.location.href='admin.php'</script>"; echo "<script>'Content-type: application/octet-stream'</script>"; ?> <div id="loginform"> <form action="dologin.php" method="post"> <table> <tr> <td><span>Username:</span></td> <td><input type="text" name="username" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td><span>Password:</span></td> <td><input type="password" name="password" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" align="right"><input type="submit" name="login" value="Login" /></td> </tr> </table> </form> </div> I have tried using require_once('yourpage.php'); before my <head></head> tags in the header document where I've specified the html information but this doesn't seem to work. I've been advised to use ob_start("ob_gzhandler"); but I am not sure how to implement this. Any advice is greatly appreciated! I am trying to create an index page which contains registration and login field the problem that i get is on successful login a warning is displayed session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at C:\xampp\htdocs\Eventz.com\index.php:116) in C:\xampp\htdocs\Eventz.com\index.php on line 235 This is the login part of my index.php this tag is inside an html table below the login form I also have a registration form and its php code above the login form Code: [Select] <?php if (isset($_REQUEST['pass'])) { $id=$_POST['id']; $pass=$_POST['pass']; $conn =mysql_connect("localhost","root",""); if (!$conn) { die('Could not connect: ' . mysql_error()); } /* checking connection....success! */ $e=mysql_select_db('test', $conn); if(!$e) { die(''.mysql_error()); } else { echo 'database selected successfully'; } if (isset($_REQUEST['id']) || (isset($_REQUEST['pass']))) { if($_REQUEST['id'] == "" || $_REQUEST['pass']=="") { echo "login fields cannot be empty"; } else { $sql=mysql_query("Select email,password from login where email='$id' AND password='$pass'"); $count=mysql_num_rows($sql); if($count==1) /* $count checks if username and password are in same row */ { session_start(); $_SESSION['id']=$id; echo "</br>Login Successful</br>"; } else { echo "</br>invalid</br>"; echo "please try to login again</br>"; } } } } ?> Any help or suggestion would be appreciated I'm making a simple login system with MySQL and PHP (very simple, I'm just starting with PHP). The MySQL portion is done, but I need to ensure only people who are logged in can see certain content. To check if people are logged in, my website checks that they have the $_SESSION['user'] variable set. If it is set, then it lets them continue through the website, if not, it tells them to login. Is that enough security, or can people simply inject a session cookie into their browser to spoof that they are logged in? My idea was to generate a session key cookie when they login (just a random string of letters and numbers) and store that in the database, then on every page, check to make sure their session key is the same thing that's in the database. Is this necessary? It seems expensive. hi everyone. i'm wondering what the best way is to create a session variable and pass it to an iframe. i need to do something along these lines, but it doesn't seem to pass the ID. Any hints on how i should accomplish this? Code: [Select] session_start(); $_SESSION['ID']=$_GET['ID']; // id from previous page $ID=session_id(); <iframe src="iframepage.php?ID=<?php echo $ID; ?>" style="width:680px; height:200px;" noresize="noresize" frameborder="0" border="0" scrolling="Yes" allowtransparency="true" /> </iframe> Just curious how other people feel about this. I am working on an application where a lot of info is pulled from MySQL and needed on multiple pages.
Would it make more sense to...
1. Pull all data ONCE and store it in SESSION variables to use on other pages
2. Pull the data from the database on each new page that needs it
I assume the preferred method is #1, but maybe there is some downside to using SESSION variables "too much"?
Side question that's kind of related: As far as URLs, is it preferable to have data stored in them (i.e. domain.com/somepage.php?somedata=something&otherdata=thisdata) or use SESSION variables to store that data so the URLs can stay general/clean (i.e. domain.com/somepage.php)?
Both are probably loaded questions but any possible insight would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Greg
Edited by galvin, 04 November 2014 - 10:30 AM. Evening! I've been iffing and ahhing over this and well im not too sure, hence the post. Code: [Select] // Redirects if there is no session id selected and echos the error on the previous page if(!isset($_GET['get']) || ($_GET['getget'])){ header("Location: #.php?error"); } So it should simply check if get is set if it isnt then see if getget is set? If not redirect and show the error. Now ive tried it and even when get/getget is set it still redirects, probably something silly. Care to share anyone? Harry. Hi I am new to PHP and I need to create an array and add both books to the array and than loop through the array this is where I am having trouble if the price of a book is less than $20.00 output the book’s name and price if the book’s title comes after the letter R in the alphabet output the book’s title. I am getting these error:
Notice: Trying to get property 'price' of non-object in C:\xampp\htdocs\PHP objects\books.php on line 45 My code is:
<?php
// Methods
$first_book = new Book();
foreach ($book as $bookItem) { Any help will be very much appreciated Thank you I took an object, and saved it into a database serialized. Code: [Select] $object_here = serialize($theobject); Then later on, I go and I get that data from a database, and try to unserialize it.. Code: [Select] $objecthere = unserialize($row->theobject) And it throws the following error...any advice? Quote Warning: unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Node no longer exists in /path/to/file on line 20 I found it helpful to configure all my objects in one or several bootstrap scripts. Before doing so, I would often find myself forgetting that I already had written some class which is located deep in some script and recreating it for some other need (granted, composer definitely helped in this regard, but using it wasn't always applicable). <?php $c=new Pimple\Container(getMySettings()); $c['pdo'] = function ($c) { $db = $c['settings']['mysql']; return new \PDO(bla); }; $c['foo'] = function ($c) { return new Foo( $c->get('pdo') ); }; $c['bar'] = function ($c) { return new Bar( $c->get('foo') ); }; It is all good until I find myself needing to create some new instance of some class instead of just passing some common instance to whoever needs it. class Foo { private $pdo; public function __construct(\PDO $pdo) { $this->pdo=$pdo; } public function getSomething():SomeClass { return new SomeClass($this->getAllDataFromDB($GET['id'])); } } class SomeClass { private $arr; public function __construct(array $records) { foreach($records as $record) { $arr[]=new SomeOtherClass($record); } } } I've read that one shouldn't create new objects in a given class's constructor, and while I could instead do so in some class's method and pass the object to the given class's constructor, to me it seems to really be the same thing. The three issues I have with this scenario a Needing to remember that these classes exist as they are hidden deep in some classes. Makes it more difficult to replace one of the classes with some other class in the future. Some duplication of code.Are there other compelling reasons not to do so? Is it worth the effort to do differently? If so, how would you recommend doing so? My thoughts would either to use Pimple's factory() method are create my only factory which also relies on anonymous functions. Maybe something else? $c['someClass'] = $c->factory(function (array $record, Container $c) { return new SomeClass($record); }); Thanks I know it is often frivolous, but sometimes I can't help trying to optimize things, and use the following two methods to create either an object injected with a string or one of a set of objects. For both cases, the class has no setters so there is no chance that the object will later be changed. I first stated doing this in continuously running server applications which I believe makes sense, however, it has leaked over to standard HTTP requests. Please commit good or bad on this approach. Thanks
public static function create(string $unit):self { static $stack=[]; if(!isset($stack[$unit])) { $stack[$unit] = new self($unit); } return $stack[$unit]; } public static function create(string $class):FunctionInterface { static $stack=[]; if(!isset($stack[$class])) { $stack[$class] = new $class; } return $stack[$class]; }
In a relational database, you "link" tables together. For example, Customer (parent) ---> Product (child) How do you do that with Objects? I have a "User" class and an "AddressBook" class. A User can have zero or more Addresses (in their AddressBook). If I create a User object and an AddressBook object, I need a way to link them up similar to how they are linked up in the database. Make sense?! TomTees Hi all,
I am working with the following 2 page script: https://github.com/k...hi/php-riot-api. All works well and the data is pulled via the API as intended. However, depending on the data I'm trying to display on screen, the object contains multiple values.
For example:
$r = $test->getSummoner($summoner_id,'name'); print_r($r);outputs their ID and name: {"585897":"TheirName"} Just as the following: $r = $test->getSummonerByName($summoner_name); print_r($r);outputs username, ID, Name, profile icon ID, level, and timestamp: {"theirname":{"id":585897,"name":"TheirName","profileIconId":642,"summonerLevel":30,"revisionDate":1405652924000}} Depending on which function I am calling (on example.php), I would like to be able to split the values so I can echo them throughout a page: Name: <value> ID: <value> Level: <value> etc... Any guidance would be appreciated. Hello, i been making a site to learn some PHP. I been always searching about what's the best way of using the PHP functions, classes and objects but i have a small question that i couldnt found the awnser by my self. so far i m inicializing an PHP class like this: 1st case Code: [Select] $themeobj = new theme(); Today i found an tuturial that used an other way of calling an function inside the class: 2nd case Code: [Select] theme::loadTheme; I understand that the way i m doing, your iniciating the variable $themeobj as an object of the class theme and that the theme:loadTheme just calls the function loadTheme inside the theme class (please correct me if i m wrong), but here's where is where i need abit of enlightment. Using the 2nd case will "skip" the loading of the __construct function? when should you use the 1st case or the 2nd case? Every time i needed an function from theme i would use $themeobj->loadTheme($param) its safe to use theme::loadTheme($param)? Thanks in advance Ever since I started using OOP this past week, I have not been able to go back to the old "procedural" methods. HOwever, I seem to be stuck on creating a mysql connection that I can reuse in all of my classes. After I set up a connection to mysql using the mysqli object, I am unable to use the mysqli in other objects. Code: [Select] $mysqli = new mysqli(.....); class new_class { function quickQuery () { $mysqli->query('some query') } } Obviously, this doesn't work, because $mysqli is not defined within that functions scope. One way, is to use global keyword. Code: [Select] global $mysqli However, globals "are the root of all evil" and simply go against the idea of encapsulation in OOP. What's a way around this? HOWEVER: 1) I still want to use the mysqli object 2) I don't want to reference the $link of the db each time I instantiate a new class .... Maybe I'm asking too much? And I've google for the past hour or so. Singleton seems interesting but it requires the creation of a new db connection class. I want to use the mysqli object. I have a function that receives two datetime values attached to the variables $start and $end. These will be in the format 'Y-m-d H:i:s'. For each of these values, I create a DateTime object to make the handling of them easier: Code: [Select] $startDT = DateTime::createFromFormat('Y-m-d H:i:s', $start); $endDT = DateTime::createFromFormat('Y-m-d H:i:s', $end); What I need to do now is ensure that the seconds of the $startDT value are always set to '00' and the seconds of the $endDT value are always set to '59'. Is there an easy way to do this without having to extract the individual values for hours, minutes and seconds before reapplying them using the setTime function, adjusting the values accordingly? |