PHP - Static Factory Class Functions/dependency Injection/singletons
Was just wondering why some people choose NOT to make use of static functions when initializing objects via Factory Classes/Containers.
What are the benefits of initializing the Factory class when for all intensive purposes, it's only used to initialize new classes, etc? Does this have any impact on Dependency Injection? I'm assuming that it doesn't since that would defeat the purpose. --------- Also, I've noticed that there seems to be an intense stigma within the development community in regard to singletons. Are singletons necessarily a bad thing? What about database objects? One argument I've heard is that this can often impact the flexibility of your application in the event that a new instance of said class needs to be initialized(a second completely separate connection). However, I was thinking that you could simply store these objects within a static member variable in the factory class; leaving the Database Class' __construct public in the event that you need to create that second/third/fourth connection. Wouldn't this resolve the issue? Similar TutorialsI'm looking for some clarification here from different viewpoints to understand real world applications. In a previous thread, I suggested to someone that they read up on singleton methods to restrict class duplication (oops!), I was quickly (and rightfully) shot down. I did this after having read through blog posts that also suggested singleton design to stop multiple MySQL connections. At the time I didn't consider that could be useful to some people.. fair enough. Thankfully I don't use singleton methods within my own code, but I do use static methods for most things. Reading through numerous blog posts, tutorials, etc.., it seems like static methods can also be considered anti-design and is something to avoid. So now it seems I'm at a point where I need to rewrite my existing framework & CMS, probably using dependency injection within my classes. I understand how this works, and why it makes sense. What I'm struggling with is understanding how to use dependency injection within a (personal) CMS application. For example - I have a config.ini file I have a class that reads the .ini file, stores the variables, and provides me methods to access them I have a content class that selects the relevant page/component from the DB (db & config dependency), then displays it via my template engine. Within the included view files I call component classes (articles, contact, etc..), each of these require a connection to the DB, which has a config dependency. Here's some code to explain it better - index.php <?php $settings = '/config/config.ini'; $config = new Config($settings); $db = new Database($config); $content = new Content( $db ); // Config may also be passed for content config - keeping it simple for example print $content->loadPage($_GET['page']); // This would now include the code below ?>Let's say that this then loads the article index (through $content->loadPage()). The view would look something like this - article_index.php <?php // Duplicated code $settings = '/config/config.ini'; $config = new Config($settings); $db = new Database($config); // Article code $articles = new Articles_Model($db); return $articles->getArticles(0,15); ?>Now my problem is that I'm duplicating the config and db class calls for no reason. Is the sollution to store these within a registry class? But then I'm creating globals, which again seems anti-design. Or is the problem how I load the active page? Any insights would be much appreciated. I'm trying to use dependency injection to pass a database connection to an object but I'm not sure why it's not working. I have my "dbClass" below that connects to a MySQL database. Code: [Select] class dbClass { public $db; function __construct() { $this->db = mysql_connect("localhost","username","password") or die ('Could not connect: ' . mysql_error()); return $this->db; } } Then I have my "baseClass". This is the class that I want to feed to connection too. Code: [Select] class baseClass { public $mysql_conn; function __construct($db) { $this->mysql_conn = $db; $rs = mysql_select_db("webdev_db", $this->mysql_conn) or die ('Could not connect: ' . mysql_error()); } } And this is my index.php file. The error I'm getting is "supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource". However I tripled checked and my db connection details are definately correct. Code: [Select] $db = new dbClass(); $baseclass = new baseClass($db); Thanks for any help. I need to create an entity which models the connection between a PHP server and another device so that a web app can change the entity's properties which in turn will update the server DB as well as the other device. A little background information for context is as follows: When a socket clients connects to the PHP server, it will register by providing its GUID, and in turn the server will query its DB to identify the specific client. The client has various other properties associated with the socket connection such as reconnect_timeout, response_timeout, etc, and the associated values will also be stored in the server's DB. While all socket clients use the same approach to communicate to the PHP server, several "flavors" of socket clients exists which use a specific protocol (Modbus/RTU, Modbus/IP, ControlNet, BACnet/IP, BACnet/MSTP, KNX, DALI) to communicate to downstream devices. Based on the used protocol, there will be different properties as well as different methods (i.e. some protocols allow one to query the device to retrieve a list of available data). To create the entity using inheritance, I would likely do so whe class ModbusRtuSocketClient extends ModbusSocketClient (which extends SocketClient) class ModbusIpSocketClient extends ModbusSocketClient (which extends SocketClient) class ControlNetSocketClient extends SocketClient etc.. But instead of doing so by using inheritance, I am thinking that I should do so through injection. For instance, I create an object called SocketClient which just deals with that scope of work and is protocol agnostic. I also create a second object which deals with a given protocol such as ModbusRtuProtocol extends ModbusProtocol extends Protocol. I then do one of the following: $entity = new SocketClient(new ModbusRtuProtocol()); //or $entity = new ModbusRtuProtocol(new SocketClient()); //and do $entity->setSomeSocketClientProperty(123); $entity->getProperty()->setSomeSpecificProtocolProperty(321); $entity->updateEndDevice(); $entityManager->persist($entity); $entityManager->flush(); //or do $values=$entity->queryDevice();
PS. If you think I shouldn't be doing so through injection but through inheritance, please advise.
Could use some help with dependency injection, as I can't seem to find the answer anywhere. Ok, take a quick PHP class:
<?php namespace myapp; use myapp\template; use myapp\order; class user { private $template; public function __construct(template $template) { $this->template = $template; } public function add_order(order $order) { // do something with $order here } }
I'm using the php-di package from http://php-di.org/ right now, but open to changing. My question is, how do I call that "add_order()" method, and have $order injected into it? Constructor injection is easy, and just use:
$container = new Di\Container(); $container->make(myapp\user);
How do I do that, but calling the add_order() method instead? I want something like:
$container = new Di\Container(); $container->make(myapp\user::add_order);
Any help?
Thanks, Matt
This topic has been moved to Application Design. http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/index.php?topic=346818.0 If a class has a constructor but also has a static method, if I call the static method does the constructor run so that I can use an output from the constructor in my static method? --Kenoli I write for example class Text: class Text { public static function test() { return 'test text'; } } Today I found this code: class Text { /** * Protected constructor since this is a static class. * * @access protected */ protected function __construct(){ // Nothing here } public static function test() { return 'test text'; } } How much appropriate is to write this? /** * Protected constructor since this is a static class. * * @access protected */ protected function __construct(){ // Nothing here } I everyone, I'm developing a small MVC framework for my personal work, now, in order to have access from all the classes to certain variables I've created a registry class, for this to work I have 2 options: 1.- passing every time the registry object to the constructor class(controllers, models, etc) or 2.- create in the registry static set and get so I can reach the variables by Registry::set(name, value) and Registry::get(name) My question is, which one of this two options takes less resources(is faster)? I hope anyone can help me with this, thanks in advance heres an example of the code i have Code: [Select] class someclass { public function run($parm) { system($parm); } public static function create($item1,$item2) { $this->run($item1 . $item2); } } then i have a file that attempts to use the create method: someclass::create($one,$two); when interpreting, i get this error: "Using $this when not in object context in" does anyone know how I can fix this? I think I understand why its wrong (the class hasn't really been set up) - I just dont know how to correct it. Is there a way I can access class functions without using $this ? additionally I tried making the run method static too, but that didnt seem to work. Is it ok to do this? Code: [Select] class Two { function anything() { classOne::anyMethod(); } } I'm sure it is but this doesn't pose very well for if I wanted to swop out one class for another. I'd then have to make changes to the code (unless I were sure all classes were named the same). -- What I want it for (and this may be another issue), is this: I may need to create more than one database instance: Code: [Select] //Database exends mysqli $db[1] = new Database(2);//database 2 used this time $db[2] = new Database(5);//db5 I then always use Database::closeAll() at any point in my script to ensure all connections are closed. Of course $this->close wouldn't close all instances/connections, just the one I was working on. I know I don;t have to close all connections, but I may as well, and there are other occasions where the first part of this question applies, so please don't just respond "no need to close". Database::closeAll() is this: Code: [Select] public static function closeAll() { //closes ALL active instances (not just this one) global $db; foreach($db as $v) { $db[$v]->close(); unset($db[$v]); } } I have the following simple class: Code: [Select] class Settings { public static $mysql_datetime_format = "%c/%e/%Y %l:%i %p " . date("[T]"); } And referencing like: Code: [Select] echo Settings::$mysql_datetime_format; But, I am getting the error: Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '.', expecting ',' or ';'. Why is this invalid? I have 2 php files. I am unable to get B's global variable from A's static method: A.php Code: [Select] class c_A { public static function f_A() { include_once( "B.php" ) ; print f_B() ; } } c_A::f_A( ); // only prints "B : " B.php Code: [Select] $gvs = "global variable from B" ; function f_B() { return "B : " . $GLOBALS[ "gvs" ] ; } any thoughts? thanks, Shannon Hello, my first post here. I created a Validation class that depends entirely on static methods. It appears to be working well, but perhaps I misunderstood exactly the purpose and the consequences of using static methods. My class essentially looks like this: class Validate { static public $errors = array(); static public $valid = array(); static public function Name($name) { if ($name != '') { self::$valid['name'] = $name; return true; } else { self::$errors['name'] = 'Name is empty'; return false; } } } Does this create any chance whatsoever for a collision of data from multiple users? I am beginning to think it does, simply because from what I have recently learned about static methods, theyr'e essentially global variables because they are not instantiated. If that's the case, then it would seem possible that during times of heavy use, any application depending on this class would confuse submitted data. Any thoughts? Thanks in advance. Hi guys, I am trying something fairly simple but I'm not sure if this would be a good practice. Basically I am using a big class called CommonLibrary that holds common functions as methods and common variables as static variables. But I have some variables here and there like $allAlphabet = range ('a' , 'z'), that cannot be declared as a property because it gives me a parse error. I don't want to call an object for this class because instancing it is of no use. Values will never change with regards to instances. So the next best thing that I tried was declaring all static variables first, and then changing thei property values inside the class __construct with self::$variable = 'somevalue', and then using this code below to assign values to the empty static variables. $dummyObject = new CommonLibrary; unset($dummyObject); echo CommonLibrary::$staticVariable; // This property is NULL before the constructer is triggered. Anyone recommend any better ways of doing this? Thanks in advance! Hi! I have a class with many functions/methods. I want to split this into different files so I can easily edit and add functions. I want every functions to be able to call eachother and with that I mean, they have to be for example in same document. My question is: I can't have a class and include functions like this: Code: [Select] class DB { include('select_functions.php'); //Only includes function's no class include('insert_functions.php'); //Only includes function's no class include('delete_functions.php'); //Only includes function's no class function test() { } } The includes will output fatal errors... How can I solve this so I can have all functions in different files but still use ONE object to call them! Thanks! I think I need to use $this, but I need to be able to add the two values returned from both of my functions. How would I do that? Code: [Select] public function get_users_edge($uid) { $users_primary->get_users_primary_edge($uid); $users_dynamic->get_users_dynamic_edge($uid); echo $users_primary + $users_dynamic; } hello i have some normal php functions that i want to put into a oop class. i cant seem to make the right changes to make it work. could some one help please. thanks these are the php functions Code: [Select] <?php function hasChild($parent_id) { $sql = "SELECT COUNT(*) as count FROM category WHERE parent_id = '" . $parent_id . "'"; $qry = mysql_query($sql); $rs = mysql_fetch_array($qry); return $rs['count']; } function CategoryTree($list,$parent,$append) { $list = '<li>'.$parent['name'].'</li>'; if (hasChild($parent['id'])) // check if the id has a child { $append++; $list .= "<ul class='child child".$append."'>"; $sql = "SELECT * FROM category WHERE parent_id = '" . $parent['id'] . "'"; $qry = mysql_query($sql); $child = mysql_fetch_array($qry); do{ $list .= CategoryTree($list,$child,$append); }while($child = mysql_fetch_array($qry)); $list .= "</ul>"; } return $list; } function CategoryList() { $list = ""; $sql = "SELECT * FROM category WHERE (parent_id = 0 OR parent_id IS NULL)"; $qry = mysql_query($sql); $parent = mysql_fetch_array($qry); $mainlist = "<ul class='parent'>"; do{ $mainlist .= CategoryTree($list,$parent,$append = 0); }while($parent = mysql_fetch_array($qry)); $list .= "</ul>"; return $mainlist; } ?> this is the class Code: [Select] <?PHP require_once(LIB_PATH.DS.'database.php'); class Menu extends DatabaseObject { protected static $table_name="menu"; protected static $db_fields = array( 'id', 'parent_id', 'name' ); public $id; public $parent_id; public $name; // "new" is a reserved word so we use "make"(or "build") public static function make( $id, $parent_id, $name) { if(!empty($id)) { $kw = new Menu(); $kw->id = (int)$id; $kw->parent_id = (int)$parent_id; $kw->name = $name; return $kw; }else{ return false; } } //end function make //PUT FUNCTIONS HERE...... function hasChild($parent_id) { $sql = "SELECT COUNT(*) as count FROM category WHERE parent_id = '" . $parent_id . "'"; $qry = mysql_query($sql); $rs = mysql_fetch_array($qry); return $rs['count']; } function CategoryTree($list,$parent,$append) { $list = '<li>'.$parent['name'].'</li>'; if (hasChild($parent['id'])) // check if the id has a child { $append++; $list .= "<ul class='child child".$append."'>"; $sql = "SELECT * FROM category WHERE parent_id = '" . $parent['id'] . "'"; $qry = mysql_query($sql); $child = mysql_fetch_array($qry); do{ $list .= CategoryTree($list,$child,$append); }while($child = mysql_fetch_array($qry)); $list .= "</ul>"; } return $list; } function CategoryList() { $list = ""; $sql = "SELECT * FROM category WHERE (parent_id = 0 OR parent_id IS NULL)"; $qry = mysql_query($sql); $parent = mysql_fetch_array($qry); $mainlist = "<ul class='parent'>"; do{ $mainlist .= CategoryTree($list,$parent,$append = 0); }while($parent = mysql_fetch_array($qry)); $list .= "</ul>"; return $mainlist; } ?> Hi,
I'm struggling to understand how to load a PHP classes for my database into a php function.
My class in on another file, which is included into my page.
I then have a function that usings the class of $database->query in the function, but for some reason this doesn't work.
However the class works on the page outside of the function, is there someway I must load the class into my function?
Thanks for reading.
Hi, I'm having a bit of a problem understanding why I'm not able to use the class I'm extending off of functions. I have a category class that extends off my core class, inside that category class, I'm able to use the core functions and variables inside all custom functions, but not the __construct function. So, to be clear, inside class class, I'm able to call $this->core->function() inside custom functions, such as function add_parent(), but not the __construct function. Why is this happening, what is the logic behind this? This is how I'm extending the class off of the core class: Code: [Select] <?php $core = new core; $parent = new parents; $parent->core =& $core; ?> With this, like I said, I'm able to use all of my core functions inside all other classes called this way, so inside all of the other classes I can do: Code: [Select] <?php $this->core->function(); ?>everywhere besides __construct(). Do I not have the class called properly? Do I need to pass my core class through differently? How can I fix this? Thanks. I am currently building my own MVC Framework and I have run into an issue that I can't solve when attempting to use 2 methods from a single model. I know that this isn't an issue with the queries or information being return. I am unsure of the proper way that I can call 2 methods when checking to see if a user is logged in... The issue that I face is both methods are calling the DB and it throws a PDO error which I don't know how to get around the issue.. Any guidance would be nice as I have been banging my head over this issue. Thank you!
Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined method PDO::Select() in C:\xampp\htdocs\PicWrist\app\models\user.class.php:318 Stack trace: #0 C:\xampp\htdocs\PicWrist\app\controllers\home.php(21): User->getUser('4') #1 C:\xampp\htdocs\PicWrist\app\core\app.php(36): Home->index() #2 C:\xampp\htdocs\PicWrist\app\init.php(47): App->__construct() #3 C:\xampp\htdocs\PicWrist\public\index.php(5): require('C:\\xampp\\htdocs...') #4 {main} thrown in C:\xampp\htdocs\PicWrist\app\models\user.class.php on line 318
//Controller <?php /** * Load the View */ class Controller{ public function view($view, $data = []) { if (file_exists('../app/views/' . $view . '.php')) { require_once '../app/views/' . $view . '.php'; } } public function model($model, $data = []) { if (file_exists('../app/models/' . $model . '.class.php')) { require_once '../app/models/' . $model . '.class.php'; return new $model(); } else return false; } } ?> //Home Controller <?php Class Home extends Controller { public static $user; public $errors; public function __construct() { self::$user = $this->model('user'); } public function index() { $userdata = []; $data = []; show(self::$user); $isLoggedin = self::$user->isLoggedin; show($isLoggedin); $userdata = self::$user->getUser($_SESSION['user_id']); show($userdata); $this->view('home', $data); } } ?> <?php /** * Users */ class User { private $db; private $errors = ''; public $isLoggedin = False; public $isAdmin = False; public function __construct() { $this->isLoggedIn(); } public function isLoggedIn() { if(isset($_SESSION['user_id'])){ $data['user_id'] = $_SESSION['user_id']; $db = Database::getInstance(); $query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE user_id = :user_id LIMIT 1"; $results = $db->Select($query, $data); if (is_array($results)) { $this->isLoggedIn = True; } } } public function getUser($id) { if(isset($id)) { $data['user_id'] = intval($id); $db = Database::getInstance(); $query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE user_id = :user_id'; $results = $db->Select($query, $data); if (is_array($results)) { return $results; } else { return False; } } else { return False; } } //DB <?php /** * Database Connection */ class Database { private $dbHost = DB_HOST; private $dbUser = DB_USER; private $dbPass = DB_PASS; private $dbName = DB_NAME; private $statment; private static $dbHandler; private $error; public function __construct() { $conn = 'mysql:host=' . $this->dbHost . ';dbname=' . $this->dbName; $options = array( PDO::ATTR_PERSISTENT => true, PDO::ATTR_ERRMODE => PDO::ERRMODE_EXCEPTION ); try { self::$dbHandler = new PDO($conn, $this->dbUser, $this->dbPass, $options); } catch (PDOException $e) { self::$error = $e->getMessage(); echo self::$error; } } public static function getInstance() { if(self::$dbHandler) { return self::$dbHandler; } return $instance = new Self(); } public function Select($query, $data = array()) { $statement = self::$dbHandler->prepare($query); $result = $statement->execute($data); If($result) { $data = $statement->fetchAll(PDO::FETCH_OBJ); if(is_array($data)) { // show($data); return $data; } } return False; } public function Update($query, $data = array()) { $statement = self::$dbHandler->prepare($query); $result = $statement->execute($data); If($result) { return True; } return False; } } ?> Edited July 14 by avargas94 Wrong Code |