|
PHP - Composer - Autoload And Psr-0 Vs Psr-4
I'm beginning to study Composer and am developing a system where I separate the files core application files, as follows:
/root
|-- /src
|-- /App
|-- /DBConfig
|-- /Controller
|-- /Model
|-- /Core
|-- /Helper
|-- /Controller
|-- /Model
So, to set this setting in composer.json file and get access to all classes both /App much /Core would be this way?
"autoload" : {
"psr-X" : {
"App\\" : "/src",
"Core\\" : "/src"
}
}
Or is there a more correct way?
I have also read about PSR-0 vs PSR-4 and I am still somewhat in doubt which one to use. In my case what should I implement, PSR-0 or PSR-4?
Similar TutorialsI'm trying to make my own framework along the lines of CodeIgniter's basic structure. I was wondering if there's a way to automatically re-load a class? Is using class autoload slower than including them yourself? Should I include/require the class file and use class autoload as a backup in case I had forgotten, or can I just let class autoload load all the class files and never worry about including/requiring. All classes are in the same directory and are always picked up - just want to know if it takes more time. Is it much of a difference? Are we talking 1 or 2 milliseconds per request??? i know how to use spl_autoload_functions, spl_autoload_register, spl_autoload_unregister. but i want to know where and how to use the functions , such spl_autoload, spl_autoload_call, spl_autoload_extendsions. my understanding is spl_autoload_entendions can return the current list of extensions each separated by comma, and also i can set the extension. if i set the extension . That how it working. Well PHP5 has a function __autoload() which makes it possible to load classes when needed, thereby eliminating excessive lines of include() or require(). Now I have a question about this feature, lets assume we have a class file like this: Code: [Select] interface Shop{ public function getshop(); public function displayshop(); public function purchase($name); public function sell($name); public function rent($name); } class Foodshop implements Shop{ // codes here } class Bookshop implements Shop{ // codes here } class Electronicshop implements Shop{ // codes here } class Petshop implements Shop{ // codes here } class Auction implements Shop{ // codes here, note the class name auction does not contain shop substring... } If I instantiate an object from one of these classes that implement (or extend) an interface(or an abstract class), how should I design my __autoload() function so that this class file will be loaded properly? Please help. hello, all i am trying to learn php, and currently trying to get my head around using classes. i have the following layout: index.php Code: [Select] <?php include("config/autoloader.php"); $content = new content(); $content->get_content(); // loads Content! $content->edit_content(); // Edits Content! ?> <?php $navbars = new navbars(); $navbars->get_navbar1(); // loads navbar1! ?> config/autoloader.php Code: [Select] <?php function spl_register_autoload($content) { include_once("classes/" . $content . ".php"); } function spl_register_autoload($navbars) { include_once("classes/" . $navbars . ".php"); } ?> content.php (content class file) Code: [Select] <?php class content { public function get_content() { echo "Show me the content!"; } public function edit_content() { echo "Edit the content"; } } ?> navbars.php navbars class file Code: [Select] <?php class navbars { public function get_navbar1() { echo "Show me the navbar1!"; } } ?> i keep getting the 500 - internal error on iis, but works on a single class file, as soon as i add more then one i get the error, can someone please help me and explain where i have gone wrong. thanks, all. Please help. I have tried to condense the following code to make it easier for someone to shed insight. The results make totally no sense to me.
I have the following two lines of code:
require_once('/var/www/bidjunction/application/classes_3rd/htmlpurifier/library/HTMLPurifier.auto.php');
$config = HTMLPurifier_Conf::createDefault();
Let me explain what happens in these two lines of code. First....
require_once('/var/www/bidjunction/application/classes_3rd/htmlpurifier/library/HTMLPurifier.auto.php'):
HTMLPurifier.auto.php is shown below:
<?php /** * This is a stub include that automatically configures the include path. */ set_include_path(dirname(__FILE__) . PATH_SEPARATOR . get_include_path() ); require_once 'HTMLPurifier/Bootstrap.php'; require_once 'HTMLPurifier.autoload.php'; // vim: et sw=4 sts=4The only thing Bootstrap.php does is define a class and execute the following line:
define('HTMLPURIFIER_PREFIX', realpath(dirname(__FILE__) . '/..'));
The only thing HTMLPurifier.autoload.php does is execute HTMLPurifier_Bootstrap::registerAutoload() (which was one of the classes defined in Bootstrap.php). The only thing HTMLPurifier_Bootstrap::registerAutoload() does is:
spl_autoload_register(array('HTMLPurifier_Bootstrap','autoload'), true, true);
Now the second line:
$config = HTMLPurifier_Conf::createDefault();I expected that HTMLPurifier_Conf::createDefault() would be executed, but no, instead the script goes to HTMLPurifier_Bootstrap:autoload() which returns false. Next, the script goes to function PHPMailerAutoload() which is in PHPMailerAutoload.php. What!!! What does PHPMailerAutoload have to do with this? While a perfect answer would be great, general comments and a strategy to troubleshoot be the next best thing. I am stumped! Please help. Hi every one, i want to know, how do i autoload my class file in each page without using include directive. Thanks I've only seen composer packages using vendor name and package name namespace. Is it possible to use deeper namespace such as the following? For instance, package:
{
"name": "notioncommotion/my-sub-namespace/my-package",
"description": "MyPackage located in MySubNamespace.",
...
}
is used in some project:
{
"require": {
"notioncommotion/my-sub-namespace/my-package": "^1.2"
}
}
If not, what do you think were the reasons composer does not allow? Thanks php74 is installed as my primary php, but I am also working with a different framework that can only use php73 and set up a separate pool to deal with it. Recently, my installed composer1 told me I should upgrade to composer2 and I did so, but then found that the previously mentioned other framework also doesn't work with composer2 but only composer1. When updating a package with composer, sometimes I get composer errors or even worse no composer errors but PHP errors later on where classes don't exist, and I think it relates to using the wrong version of PHP (and maybe even composer). Is it always required to consistently use composer with a single version of PHP? Anything to worry about different versions of composer or will I just get a message. Any other best practices? Any issues how I set up composer below? Thanks!
curl -sS https://getcomposer.org/installer | php
# or if desired, use resulting composer.phar as: $ php (or php73) composer.phar update/install/etc
chmod +x composer.phar
sudo mv composer.phar /usr/local/bin/composer
sudo ln -s /usr/local/bin/composer /usr/local/bin/composer2
curl -sS https://getcomposer.org/installer | php73
chmod +x composer.phar
sudo mv composer.phar /usr/local/bin/composer2_73
php -r "copy('https://getcomposer.org/installer', 'composer-setup.php');"
php -r "if (hash_file('sha384', 'composer-setup.php') === '756890a4488ce9024fc62c56153228907f1545c228516cbf63f885e036d37e9a59d27d63f46af1d4d07ee0f76181c7d3') { echo 'Installer verified'; } else { echo 'Installer corrupt'; unlink('composer-setup.php'); } echo PHP_EOL;"
php composer-setup.php --version=1.10.19
chmod +x composer.phar
sudo mv composer.phar /usr/local/bin/composer1
php73 composer-setup.php --version=1.10.19
chmod +x composer.phar
sudo mv composer.phar /usr/local/bin/composer1_73
rm composer-setup.php
Hello, I'm new to the forum and I'm looking for advice. I use a bunch of classes in namespaces that are I'm attempting to organize for autoloading. In other words, a class called \Foo\Package\Class is loaded from the file at Foo\Package\Class.php. I'm using spl_autoload for this. (If I were on 5.2 I could be using underscore-delimited pseudo-namespaces just as well; the implementation detail isn't important) Now, I want to have multiple separate apps that use a single common library. Each app also has some classes that are local to it. How should I solve the autoloading problem? I thought of the following approach. Is it any good? Try autoloading from the common class library If it fails, try autoloading from the app's own local library Part 2 of the question: Within my apps, though, there are two types of classes: library ("vendor") classes that are only being used in that particular app so they don't need to be in the shared library, and app-specific classes that are the core of the app (so they, by definition, don't need to be in any shared library). I'd probably like to keep these two separate, so I'd need to add point #3 to the list above: search in the "core" class hierarchy of the local app. This gives 3 separate locations, and the problem is that they negate the advantages namespaces since there can be overlap. In which case one class will override the other during autoloading. So order of the above list would matter. And time would be wasted looking for a class in the first two places if it's more often in the third. A solution I was considering is sticking to just one central library of classes (and dumping all app-local libraries there). Then, the core classes that belong to one app would be under an \AppName namespace. I'm looking forward to some insights from the experts. How do you guys organize your class libraries? Quick question about the dependency manager Composer with PHP. I have it installed and am pulling in a few libraries, it works pretty well as far as I can tell. I have a question that might be dumb, so I apologize in advance. When connecting to your application it's still required to use the lines similar to the following? <script src="vendor/components/jquery/jquery.min.js"></script> <link rel="stylesheet" href="vendor/twbs/bootstrap/dist/css/bootstrap.css" > Also I'm trying to figure out how to install the x3dom library, but cannot get composer to do it. (https://www.x3dom.org/) I think I am close, but not sure if I am quite there. Am I doing this correctly? I have several entity classes which will use class type inheritance:
MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle #MyNamespace.MyApp.Vehicle.Vehicle.dcm.yml MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle: type: entity table: vehicle_table inheritanceType: JOINED discriminatorColumn: name: discriminator_column type: string discriminatorMap: vehicle: Vehicle groundVehicle: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle\GroundVehicle airVehicle: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\AirVehicle repositoryClass: Vehicle id: id: type: integer generator: strategy: AUTO fields: grandParentItem1: type: string grandParentItem2: type: string #MyNamespace.MyApp.Vehicle.AirVehicle.AirVehicle.dcm.yml MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\AirVehicle: type: entity table: air_vehicle extends: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle inheritanceType: JOINED discriminatorMap: airVehicle: AirVehicle airplane: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\Airplane\Airplane rocket: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\Rocket\Rocket repositoryClass: AirVehicle id: id: associationKey: true fields: parentItem1: type: string parentItem2: type: string #MyNamespace.MyApp.Vehicle.AirVehicle.Rocket.Rocket.dcm.yml MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\Rocket\Rocket: extends: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\AirVehicle type: entity table: rocket_table id: id: associationKey: true repositoryClass: Rocket fields: childItem1: type: string childItem2: type: string I haven't shown GroundVehicle or Train, Car, and Airplane, but they are almost identical to AirVehicle and Rocket, respectively.
I've discovered that the barebone entities need to be manually created prior to using orm:generate-entities else I get class not found errors, and have created them as shown below.
[michael@devserver doctrine]$ find inheritance_src -name "*.php" -exec cat {} \;
<?php
namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\Airplane;
class Airplane extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\AirVehicle{}
<?php
namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\Rocket;
class Rocket extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\AirVehicle{}
<?php
namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle;
abstract class AirVehicle extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle{}
<?php
namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle\Car;
class Car extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle\GroundVehicle{}
<?php
namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle\Train;
class Train extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle\GroundVehicle{}
<?php
namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle;
abstract class GroundVehicle extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle{}
<?php
namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle;
abstract class Vehicle{}
I then am able to successfully create the entities using orm:generate-entities, schema using orm:schema-tool:create, and repositories using orm:generate-repositories. Does everything seem correct? A couple of issues which I have my doubts: Locating the classes in inheritance_src/MyNamespace/MyApp instead of inheritance_src/MyApp. I tried to do the later and modify my psr-4 autoloader to use "MyNamespace\\": "inheritance_src/", but could not get it working without first creating the entities, editing them to add the "abstract" and "extend" portions, and then moving them to one directory lower. Needing to manually create the barebone classes in the first place. My meta-data definitions includes "extends: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle", so I would thought it would not be necessary. Locate both the entities and repositories in the same folder. For that matter, I will probably be locating my service in the same folder as well. It seems that most frameworks will locate all the entities in one folder (with of course subdirectories), repositories in another, services in another, etc. The way I am doing seems to be organized domain modules as described by https://mnapoli.fr/organizing-code-into-domain-modules/. Any compelling reasons to do it one way or the other?
Thank you Hi.
My sys admin guy has informed me that installing composer is unlikely. They're a bit jumpy about security around here.
I tried to download and run Laravel on it's own but I'm getting errors when I go to http://example.com/t...laravel/public/
Warning: require(/var/www/html/test/laravel/bootstrap/../vendor/autoload.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/html/test/laravel/bootstrap/autoload.php on line 17 Fatal error: require(): Failed opening required '/var/www/html/test/laravel/bootstrap/../vendor/autoload.php' (include_path='.:/php/includes:/var/www/html/php/includes:/jpa/release/jpa/includes:/usr/share/pear:/usr/share/php/phpmailer:/apache/htdocs/applications/surveys/Includes:/var/lib/ZF1/library') in /var/www/html/test/laravel/bootstrap/autoload.php on line 17I'm very new to Laravel and I am basically assuming that the reason for these errors is because i haven't installed all the various dependancies. And that you can only install all the dependancies through Composer. Is this the case? I downloaded the Laravel framework from GitHub Unfortunately.. My only real experience of PHP Frameworks is CodeIgniter. So I've never expoled/used "packages" or "dependancies" and don't really know where they are, or where they go, or what they do! I managed to get Laravel up and running on my personal computer (using Composer).... But, as I've said, I might not be able to do this on my day job server. Any tips? ----- Update ----- Is there a chance I am just misunderstanding the word "Dependancies"? It's not a word I often use. Does it just mean "The PHP files that make up the Laravel Framework"? Edited by Korferer, 19 November 2014 - 08:11 AM. I want to install this package:
https://github.com/composer/installers
from GitHub, I can easily git clone it but I think its better I get experienced with composer. In the readme they onyl give one example, one involving CakePHP:
{
"name": "you/ftp",
"type": "cakephp-plugin",
"require": {
"composer/installers": "~1.0"
}
}
but I that isn't much help to me since I'm not making composer.json files to hold a single framework or plugin, my json files look more like this:
{
"name": "example-app",
"require": {
"cakephp/cakephp": ">=2.5.1",
"cakephp/debug_kit": "2.2.*",
"slywalker/boost_cake": "*",
"CakeDC/tags": "1.*",
"CakeDC/utils": "*",
"CakeDC/migrations": "*",
"FriendsOfCake/crud": "*",
"CakeDC/search": "*",
"paulredmond/chosen-cakephp": "*"
},
"config": {
"vendor-dir": "Vendor/"
},
"extra": {
"installer-paths": {
"app/Plugin/Tags": ["CakeDC/tags"],
"app/Plugin/BoostCake": ["slywalker/boost_cake"]
}
}
}
Right now I'm working on a WordPress one and it is 10 times longer than that. So what I was wondering is if its better to split it up into a few composer.json files. As in one file for setting up the framework and configuring it, when its done, it calls a second composer.json file that will take care of installing the plugins. Like this I suppose I could store a bunch of composer.json files in a central location, each of them has a specific purpose, so if I need to use one of them for a project, I just call composer.phar file (which I can access globally), and use that global keywork to make the json file operate like its in my projects directory. I don't understand what this autoload thing is about at all, but its nice the way it lets you run scripts at particular times during the execution of the json file.
Is this actually a better way to work with composer, by chaining separate composer.json files together? A big issue is the name conflict thing, is there a way to make composer.phar process files with different names? It be a pain in the ass having to make the scripts alter the filenames. That gets me thinking about something. Can we define variables in composer.json files? If not, I suppose its not very hard to do it anyway by editing the file. I was thinking there that a composer file generator would be pretty useful. Like say on CakePHPs website, theres a page that lets you check plugins and features that you want for your new installation, then it makes a composer.json file for you.
I've got my own proprietary framework. I call it Brain. It uses composer, and installation is done with a single composer file, which is handy. Here's an example:
{
"name": "skunkbad/brain-test",
"description": "My Awesome App",
"license": "proprietary",
"minimum-stability": "dev",
"repositories": [
{
"type": "hg",
"url": "ssh://hg@bitbucket.org/skunkbad/brain"
}
],
"require": {
"skunkbad/brain": "default"
},
"scripts": {
"post-install-cmd": "Brain\\Statics\\BrainInstallScript::run"
}
}
Brain has it's own dependencies, which aren't all really dependencies, but I've added them all to its composer.json file so I get everything I want for a new project. Here is it's composer.json:
{
"name": "skunkbad/brain",
"version": "1.0.0",
"type": "framework",
"license": "Proprietary",
"authors": [
{
"name": "Robert B Gottier",
"email": "xXxXxXxXx@gmail.com",
"homepage": "http://brianswebdesign.com",
"role": "Developer"
}
],
"require": {
"pimple/pimple" : "v2.0.0",
"swiftmailer/swiftmailer": "v5.2.0",
"dompdf/dompdf" : "0.6.1",
"phpseclib/phpseclib" : "0.3.6",
"stripe/stripe-php" : "v1.15.0",
"firephp/firephp-core" : "dev-master",
"doctrine/dbal" : "v2.4.2"
},
"autoload": {
"psr-4": {
"Brain\\": "/",
"App\\": "../../../App/"
},
"classmap": [
"Statics/"
]
}
}
In Windows terminal, I can run composer install or composer install --prefer-dist, and it seems that especially when the doctrine packages are being downloaded or cloned (whatever it does), its super slow. Some of them hang for so long that occasionally the terminal will give me a message indicating a particular package timed out (5 mins).
So I was wondering if this is just the norm. Feels like I'm on dial-up, but my internet connection is Verizon FiOS (fiber optic). Here is an example of the time-out message I get from Composer:
Failed to download doctrine/common from source: The process "git clone --no-checkout "git://github.com/doctrine/common.git" "C:\XXXxxx" && cd /D "C:\XXXxxx" && git remote add composer "git://github.com/doctrine/common.git" && git fetch composer" exceeded the timeout of 300 seconds.
I timed my install, and composer/common actually hung for about 7 mins. Total time was 9.5 mins.
Good morning, people! I'm having the following problem in my projectx in php: I created a project with Composer in php where I put php to listen to the public folder from the command prompt. However, when I upload the project to the site or to the xampp htdocs, the result of displaying the index (domain / projectx / public) is white. It does not display anything or any warning. Running with the php server via prompt listening directly to the public folder the project runs normally. The structure of the project is this (it has an attached image too):
projeto x
-App
-Controller (folder with controllers)
-Model (folder with models)
-View (folder with views)
-Connection (DB connection class)
-Route (Class that manages the routes accessed in the browser and instantiates the necessary controllers)
-public
-.htaccess
-index.php (Application start page that instantiates the Route class to determine the flow of the application)
-vendor
-composer (folder with composer files)
-autoload.php
composer.json
composer.lock
composer.phar
When I include files in the public folder and access directly, the file works normally. That is, the server is listening to all folders.
Could you help me with this? If I have to configure something on the server or in my project? I am new to PHP and would greatly appreciate your help. Right now, I'm grateful! Application running on the latest version of Composer. Tested on php version 5.6.40 and 7.1
I just updated a site as follows: cd /var/www/concrete5 composer update Among other changes, the following were made (more on this later): - Updating concrete5/core (8.5.2 => 8.5.4): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/collections (1.6.4 => 1.6.5): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/lexer (1.2.0 => 1.2.1): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/inflector (1.3.1 => 1.4.3): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/cache (1.10.0 => 1.10.1): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/annotations (1.10.2 => 1.10.3): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/common (2.12.0 => 2.13.3): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/instantiator (1.3.0 => 1.3.1): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/orm (v2.7.2 => v2.7.3): Downloading (100%)
errno: 150 "Foreign key constraint is incorrectly formed I expected I should have first used concrete5's update script, but too late for that. So, then I changed composer.json require concrete5/core from ^8.5 to 8.5.2 hoping to return to the previous state. Concreete5 was downgraded as desired, but now I get the following error: Class 'Doctrine\Common\Persistence\Mapping\Driver\MappingDriverChain' not found On another concrete5 site which still works, I have the following two files, however, on the broken one I only have the second: vendor/doctrine/persistence/lib/Doctrine/Common/Persistence/Mapping/Driver/MappingDriverChain.php:13: class MappingDriverChain extends \Doctrine\Persistence\Mapping\Driver\MappingDriverChain vendor/doctrine/persistence/lib/Doctrine/Persistence/Mapping/Driver/MappingDriverChain.php:17:class MappingDriverChain implements MappingDriverSo, now I will attempt to downgrade doctrine from 2.7.3 to 2.7.2. The base composer.json file has no reference to Doctrine, but there are two other related composer files: vendor/concrete5/doctrine-xml/composer.json
{
"name": "concrete5/doctrine-xml",
"description": "Define database structure via XML using Doctrine data types",
"keywords": [
"doctrine",
"xml",
"structure",
"database",
"schema"
],
"homepage": "https://github.com/concrete5/doctrine-xml",
"license": "MIT",
"autoload": {
"psr-4": {
"DoctrineXml\\": "src/"
}
},
"require": {
"php": ">=5.3"
},
"require-dev": {
"doctrine/dbal": "2.5.*"
}
}
vendor/concrete5/dependency-patches/composer.json
{
"type":"library",
"license":"MIT",
"name":"concrete5/dependency-patches",
"description":"Patches required for concrete5 dependencies",
"homepage":"https://github.com/concrete5/dependency-patches",
"authors":[
{
"name":"Michele Locati",
"email":"michele@locati.it",
"role":"author",
"homepage":"https://mlocati.github.io"
}
],
"require":{
"mlocati/composer-patcher": "^1.0.0"
},
"extra":{
"patches": {
"doctrine/annotations:1.2.7": {
"Fix access array offset on value of type null": "doctrine/annotations/access-array-offset-on-null.patch"
},
"doctrine/orm:2.5.14": {
"Fix UnitOfWork::createEntity()": "doctrine/orm/UnitOfWork-createEntity-continue.patch"
},
"zendframework/zend-stdlib:2.7.7": {
"Fix ArrayObject::unserialize()": "zendframework/zend-stdlib/ArrayObject-unserialize-continue.patch"
},
"sunra/php-simple-html-dom-parser:1.5.2": {
"Fix minus in regular expressions": "sunra/php-simple-html-dom-parser/minus-in-regular-expressions.patch"
},
"phpunit/phpunit:4.8.36": {
"Avoid each() in Getopt": "phpunit/phpunit/Getopt-each.patch"
},
"tedivm/jshrink:1.1.0": {
"Fix continue switch in Minifier": "tedivm/jshrink/fix-minifier-loop.patch",
"Update to upstream version 1.3.2": "tedivm/jshrink/update-upstream-1.3.2.patch"
},
"zendframework/zend-code:2.6.3": {
"Fix continue switch in FileGenerator and MethodReflection": "zendframework/zend-code/switch-continue.patch"
},
"zendframework/zend-http:2.6.0": {
"Remove support for the X-Original-Url and X-Rewrite-Url headers": "zendframework/zend-http/no-x-original-url-x-rewrite.patch"
},
"zendframework/zend-mail:2.7.3": {
"Fix idn_to_ascii deprecation warning": "zendframework/zend-mail/fix-idn_to_ascii-deprecation-warning.patch"
},
"zendframework/zend-validator:2.8.2": {
"Fix idn_to_ascii/idn_to_utf8 deprecation warning": "zendframework/zend-validator/fix-idn_to_-deprecation-warning.patch"
}
}
}
}
Neither seem to be applicable, but the doctrine version has to be specified somewhere. How does composer determine which version and how can I downgrade the dependency package? Thanks
PS. As a hack solution, I replaced the entire vendor/doctrine directory from one from another site, and have things working. Still, want to know how to do this right. Edited June 12, 2020 by NotionCommotionAccording to I would like to try to use JWT for my PHP and these are my step
on domain/app/
so I have
and on the login.php
try{
echo "1";
require_once('vendor/autoload.php');
use firebase\JWT\JWT;
echo "2";
} catch (Exception $e) {
echo 'Caught exception: ', $e->getMessage(), "\n";
}
It's not show any thing and error "HTTP ERROR 500"
Hallo, I have a strange problem with a freshly installed composer project that is not loading the dependencies as the documentation states it should. composer require phpmailer/phpmailer
ini_set('display_errors', 1);
ini_set('display_startup_errors', 1);
error_reporting(E_ALL);
// define('BASE_PATH', rtrim(preg_replace('#[/\\\\]{1}#', '/', realpath(dirname(__FILE__))), '/') . '/');
// require BASE_PATH . 'vendor/autoload.php';
require __DIR__ . '/vendor/autoload.php';
Edited June 23, 2020 by JacobSeated I notice plenty of CakePHP plugins don't have composer.json files in their github repositories (I'm not sure where composer downloads from if you don't specify a repository, is it github?) so I can't automatically download and update them. For composer to recognise and download the plugins, all thats needed is the composer.js file itself isn't it? Why wouldn't plugin authors just spend an extra 10 minutes and make a composer.js file? I'm guessing theres something I'm missing here, it must not be that simple. I only started using composer so I don't really know what its about yet.
|
|||||||