PHP - Doctrine, Composer, And Namespace
I think I am close, but not sure if I am quite there. Am I doing this correctly? I have several entity classes which will use class type inheritance:
MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle #MyNamespace.MyApp.Vehicle.Vehicle.dcm.yml MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle: type: entity table: vehicle_table inheritanceType: JOINED discriminatorColumn: name: discriminator_column type: string discriminatorMap: vehicle: Vehicle groundVehicle: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle\GroundVehicle airVehicle: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\AirVehicle repositoryClass: Vehicle id: id: type: integer generator: strategy: AUTO fields: grandParentItem1: type: string grandParentItem2: type: string #MyNamespace.MyApp.Vehicle.AirVehicle.AirVehicle.dcm.yml MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\AirVehicle: type: entity table: air_vehicle extends: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle inheritanceType: JOINED discriminatorMap: airVehicle: AirVehicle airplane: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\Airplane\Airplane rocket: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\Rocket\Rocket repositoryClass: AirVehicle id: id: associationKey: true fields: parentItem1: type: string parentItem2: type: string #MyNamespace.MyApp.Vehicle.AirVehicle.Rocket.Rocket.dcm.yml MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\Rocket\Rocket: extends: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\AirVehicle type: entity table: rocket_table id: id: associationKey: true repositoryClass: Rocket fields: childItem1: type: string childItem2: type: string I haven't shown GroundVehicle or Train, Car, and Airplane, but they are almost identical to AirVehicle and Rocket, respectively.
I've discovered that the barebone entities need to be manually created prior to using orm:generate-entities else I get class not found errors, and have created them as shown below. [michael@devserver doctrine]$ find inheritance_src -name "*.php" -exec cat {} \; <?php namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\Airplane; class Airplane extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\AirVehicle{} <?php namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\Rocket; class Rocket extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\AirVehicle{} <?php namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle; abstract class AirVehicle extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle{} <?php namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle\Car; class Car extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle\GroundVehicle{} <?php namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle\Train; class Train extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle\GroundVehicle{} <?php namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle; abstract class GroundVehicle extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle{} <?php namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle; abstract class Vehicle{} I then am able to successfully create the entities using orm:generate-entities, schema using orm:schema-tool:create, and repositories using orm:generate-repositories. Does everything seem correct? A couple of issues which I have my doubts: Locating the classes in inheritance_src/MyNamespace/MyApp instead of inheritance_src/MyApp. I tried to do the later and modify my psr-4 autoloader to use "MyNamespace\\": "inheritance_src/", but could not get it working without first creating the entities, editing them to add the "abstract" and "extend" portions, and then moving them to one directory lower. Needing to manually create the barebone classes in the first place. My meta-data definitions includes "extends: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle", so I would thought it would not be necessary. Locate both the entities and repositories in the same folder. For that matter, I will probably be locating my service in the same folder as well. It seems that most frameworks will locate all the entities in one folder (with of course subdirectories), repositories in another, services in another, etc. The way I am doing seems to be organized domain modules as described by https://mnapoli.fr/organizing-code-into-domain-modules/. Any compelling reasons to do it one way or the other?
Thank you Similar TutorialsI've only seen composer packages using vendor name and package name namespace. Is it possible to use deeper namespace such as the following? For instance, package: { "name": "notioncommotion/my-sub-namespace/my-package", "description": "MyPackage located in MySubNamespace.", ... } is used in some project: { "require": { "notioncommotion/my-sub-namespace/my-package": "^1.2" } } If not, what do you think were the reasons composer does not allow? Thanks I have a class which has two general types of methods.
Those which are used by the core class, and shouldn't be overridden.
Those which are "used" by the methods described above, and these can be overridden and new methods can be added. They are all private or protected, and not public.
For those used by the core class, I use the "final" keyword to prevent.
I am not really versed in namespace, but this seems like where it might be used.
Could I get a couple of pointers where to start?
Thanks
Hoping to get some thoughts on how Doctrine array collections should be used when the position of the items in the collection must be controlled. For instance, I have a Chart object which has various primitive properties as well as a series property which is an array collection. Each member in the series collection is a Serie object which has various primitive properties as well as a data property which is an array collection. Each member in the data collection is a Datum object which includes various primitive properties. The following just refers to the series collection, however, will be doing the same with the data collection. Chart will have methods to add a Serie to the end of the series collection, modify a Serie for a given position, delete a Serie for a given position, swap the position of two Serie, and retrieve all Serie(s) in their designated position order. To implement this, my thought is to include a integer position property in Serie, and when retrieving the results will just ORDER BY this column if using DQL or maybe will use Criteria to filter the results. I am not, however, sure how to implement some of the other methods. When adding a new Serie to the end of the collection, should I do something like: class Chart { public function addSerie(array $params):Chart { $serie=new Serie(); $serie->setName($params['name']); $position=$this->series->count(); $serie->setPosition($position); $this->addSeries($serie); } }
class Chart { public function __construct() { $this->series->getIterator()->uasort(function ($first, $second) { return (int) $first->getPosition() > (int) $second->getPosition() ? 1 : -1; }); } }
PS. Originally, I was using the name "Series" instead of "Serie", but the lack of separate forms for singular and plural was messing with me. Was thinking of using SeriesNode instead, but didn't want to need to follow this same naming convention for other items... The classes with the name of the first query column are located one directory above the file making the query. Tried use aliases as well as trying to include the name space in the first column of the query but no luck. Thanks
$stmt->fetchAll(\PDO::FETCH_CLASS | \PDO::FETCH_CLASSTYPE);
hey guy I've just recently re-altered my autoloader class which works with namespaces but it also calls classes which aren't namespaced, like so:
$class = new myclass();instead of $class = new Class\Myclass;im wondering have i defeated the whole point of namespacing and if all my classes should actually be namespaced hope its not such a pointless question I am trying to class type inheritance with Doctrine. Eventually, I will be defining things using XML, but all the examples are done using doctags. I found the following and it seems to work. <?php use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM; /** * Inventory entity * * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="Inventory") * @ORM\Table(name="inventory") * @ORM\InheritanceType("JOINED") * @ORM\DiscriminatorColumn(name="discriminator_column", type="string") * @ORM\DiscriminatorMap({"inventory" = "AbstractItem", "inventory_room" = "Room"}) */ abstract class AbstractItem { /** * @ORM\Id @ORM\Column(name="inventory_id") @ORM\GeneratedValue * @var int */ protected $inventory_id; /** * @ORM\Column(type="string") * @var string */ protected $category; /** * @ORM\Column(type="string") * @var string */ protected $part_number; } use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM; /** * Inventory Room entity * @ORM\Entity * @ORM\Table(name="inventory_room") */ class Room extends AbstractItem { /** * @ORM\Column(type="string") * @var string */ protected $room_type; /** * @ORM\Column(type="string") * @var string */ protected $rack_limit;
But then I convert it to XML or YAML, and I get a Entity class 'Room' used in the discriminator map of class 'AbstractItem' does not exist error when trying to build the classes. I've also tried changing the type to mappedSuperclass, but no success. Any ideas? Also, what is the purpose of the DiscriminatorColumn? Thanks
AbstractItem: type: entity table: inventory inheritanceType: JOINED discriminatorColumn: name: discriminator_column type: string discriminatorMap: inventory: AbstractItem inventory_room: Room repositoryClass: Inventory id: inventory_id: type: string fields: category: type: string part_number: type: string Room: type: entity table: inventory_room fields: room_type: type: string rack_limit: type: string
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <doctrine-mapping xmlns="http://doctrine-project.org/schemas/orm/doctrine-mapping" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://doctrine-project.org/schemas/orm/doctrine-mapping https://www.doctrine-project.org/schemas/orm/doctrine-mapping.xsd"> <entity repository-class="Inventory" name="AbstractItem" table="inventory" inheritance-type="JOINED"> <discriminator-column name="discriminator_column" type="string" length="255"/> <discriminator-map> <discriminator-mapping value="inventory" class="AbstractItem"/> <discriminator-mapping value="inventory_room" class="Room"/> </discriminator-map> <id name="inventory_id" type="string" column="inventory_id"> <generator strategy="IDENTITY"/> </id> <field name="category" type="string" column="category" precision="0" scale="0" nullable="false"/> <field name="part_number" type="string" column="part_number" precision="0" scale="0" nullable="false"/> </entity> </doctrine-mapping> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <doctrine-mapping xmlns="http://doctrine-project.org/schemas/orm/doctrine-mapping" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://doctrine-project.org/schemas/orm/doctrine-mapping https://www.doctrine-project.org/schemas/orm/doctrine-mapping.xsd"> <entity name="Room" table="inventory_room"> <id name="inventory_id" type="string" column="inventory_id"> <generator strategy="IDENTITY"/> </id> <field name="room_type" type="string" column="room_type" precision="0" scale="0" nullable="false"/> <field name="rack_limit" type="string" column="rack_limit" precision="0" scale="0" nullable="false"/> <field name="category" type="string" column="category" precision="0" scale="0" nullable="false"/> <field name="part_number" type="string" column="part_number" precision="0" scale="0" nullable="false"/> </entity> </doctrine-mapping>
This topic has been moved to Other Libraries and Frameworks. http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/index.php?topic=324009.0 The following metadata... <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <doctrine-mapping xmlns="http://doctrine-project.org/schemas/orm/doctrine-mapping" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://doctrine-project.org/schemas/orm/doctrine-mapping https://www.doctrine-project.org/schemas/orm/doctrine-mapping.xsd"> <entity name="NotionCommotion\App\Account\PublicAccountIdIncrementor" table="public_account_id_incrementor"> <id name="account" association-key="true"/> <field name="chart_id" type="integer"> <options> <option name="default">0</option> </options> </field> <field name="source_id" type="integer"> <options> <option name="default">0</option> </options> </field> <one-to-one field="account" target-entity="NotionCommotion\App\Account\Account" fetch="LAZY" inversed-by="idPublicIncrementor"> <join-columns> <join-column name="id" referenced-column-name="id" nullable="false"/> </join-columns> </one-to-one> </entity> </doctrine-mapping> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <doctrine-mapping xmlns="http://doctrine-project.org/schemas/orm/doctrine-mapping" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://doctrine-project.org/schemas/orm/doctrine-mapping https://www.doctrine-project.org/schemas/orm/doctrine-mapping.xsd"> <entity name="NotionCommotion\App\Account\Account" table="account"> <id name="id" type="integer"/> <one-to-one field="idPublicIncrementor" target-entity="NotionCommotion\App\Account\PublicAccountIdIncrementor" mapped-by="account"/> </entity> </doctrine-mapping> creates the following methods... <?php class Account { /** * Set idPublicIncrementor. * * @param \NotionCommotion\App\Account\PublicAccountIdIncrementor|null $idPublicIncrementor * * @return Account */ public function setIdPublicIncrementor(\NotionCommotion\App\Account\PublicAccountIdIncrementor $idPublicIncrementor = null) { $this->idPublicIncrementor = $idPublicIncrementor; return $this; } /** * Get idPublicIncrementor. * * @return \NotionCommotion\App\Account\PublicAccountIdIncrementor|null */ public function getIdPublicIncrementor() { return $this->idPublicIncrementor; } } As seen, Account::idPublicIncrementor allows NULL value. Is this by design since PublicAccountIdIncrementor's primary key is Account's primary key? If not, how do I instruct Doctrine to prevent NULL? Trying to create a model where Parent1 and Parent2 extend Grandparent, and Child1_1 and Child1_2 extend Parent1 as well as Child2_1 and Child2_2 extend Parent2. I set up my definitions: Grandparent: type: entity table: grandparent_table inheritanceType: JOINED discriminatorColumn: name: discriminator_column_grandparent type: string repositoryClass: GrandParent id: id: type: integer generator: strategy: AUTO fields: GrandParent_Item1: type: string GrandParent_Item2: type: string Parent1: type: entity table: parent_table1 extends: Grandparent inheritanceType: JOINED discriminatorColumn: name: discriminator_column_parent1 type: string id: id: associationKey: true fields: Parent1_Item1: type: string Parent1_Item2: type: string Parent2: type: entity table: parent_table2 extends: Grandparent inheritanceType: JOINED discriminatorColumn: name: discriminator_column_parent2 type: string id: id: associationKey: true fields: Parent2_Item1: type: string Parent2_Item2: type: string Child1_1: extends: Parent1 type: entity table: child1_1_table id: id: associationKey: true fields: Child1_1_Item1: type: string Child1_1_Item2: type: string Child1_2: extends: Parent1 type: entity table: child1_2_table id: id: associationKey: true fields: Child1_2_Item1: type: string Child1_2_Item2: type: string Child2_1: extends: Parent2 type: entity table: child2_1_table id: id: associationKey: true fields: Child2_1_Item1: type: string Child2_1_Item2: type: string Child2_2: extends: Parent2 type: entity table: child2_2_table id: id: associationKey: true fields: Child2_2_Item1: type: string Child2_2_Item2: type: string And then generate my entities: $ vendor/bin/doctrine orm:generate-entities -vvv src Processing entity "Child1_1" Processing entity "Child1_2" Processing entity "Child2_1" Processing entity "Child2_2" Processing entity "Grandparent" Processing entity "Parent1" Processing entity "Parent2" [OK] Entity classes generated to "/var/www/doctrine/src" Note that I needed to manually edit the Parent1 and 2 classes to extend Grandparent as well as the individual Child classes to extend their applicable Parent. Next, I create the schema: $ vendor/bin/doctrine orm:schema-tool:create --dump-sql The following SQL statements will be executed: CREATE TABLE child1_1_table (id INT NOT NULL, Child1_1_Item1 VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, Child1_1_Item2 VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY(id)) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE utf8mb4_unicode_ci ENGINE = InnoDB; CREATE TABLE child1_2_table (id INT NOT NULL, Child1_2_Item1 VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, Child1_2_Item2 VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY(id)) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE utf8mb4_unicode_ci ENGINE = InnoDB; CREATE TABLE child2_1_table (id INT NOT NULL, Child2_1_Item1 VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, Child2_1_Item2 VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY(id)) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE utf8mb4_unicode_ci ENGINE = InnoDB; CREATE TABLE child2_2_table (id INT NOT NULL, Child2_2_Item1 VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, Child2_2_Item2 VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY(id)) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE utf8mb4_unicode_ci ENGINE = InnoDB; CREATE TABLE grandparent_table (id INT AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL, GrandParent_Item1 VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, GrandParent_Item2 VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, discriminator_column_grandparent VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY(id)) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE utf8mb4_unicode_ci ENGINE = InnoDB; CREATE TABLE parent_table1 (id INT NOT NULL, Parent1_Item1 VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, Parent1_Item2 VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY(id)) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE utf8mb4_unicode_ci ENGINE = InnoDB; CREATE TABLE parent_table2 (id INT NOT NULL, Parent2_Item1 VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, Parent2_Item2 VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY(id)) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE utf8mb4_unicode_ci ENGINE = InnoDB; ALTER TABLE child1_1_table ADD CONSTRAINT FK_3445750EBF396750 FOREIGN KEY (id) REFERENCES grandparent_table (id) ON DELETE CASCADE; ALTER TABLE child1_2_table ADD CONSTRAINT FK_5AD6F93BF396750 FOREIGN KEY (id) REFERENCES grandparent_table (id) ON DELETE CASCADE; ALTER TABLE child2_1_table ADD CONSTRAINT FK_DC849CBBF396750 FOREIGN KEY (id) REFERENCES grandparent_table (id) ON DELETE CASCADE; ALTER TABLE child2_2_table ADD CONSTRAINT FK_3C205356BF396750 FOREIGN KEY (id) REFERENCES grandparent_table (id) ON DELETE CASCADE; ALTER TABLE parent_table1 ADD CONSTRAINT FK_5386E15BBF396750 FOREIGN KEY (id) REFERENCES grandparent_table (id) ON DELETE CASCADE; ALTER TABLE parent_table2 ADD CONSTRAINT FK_CA8FB0E1BF396750 FOREIGN KEY (id) REFERENCES grandparent_table (id) ON DELETE CASCADE; I see how Grandparent has discriminatorColumn discriminator_column_grandparent as expected. But why doesn't Parent1 and Parent2 have discriminatorColumn's discriminator_column_parent1 and discriminator_column_parent2? Note that I've also tried making Grandparent, Parent1, and Parent2 abstract but get the same results. I've also messed around with Mapped Superclasses, but I don't think they are applicable for my use (correct me if you think I am wrong). Thanks! I'm starting in Doctrine 2.4 and I'm developing a system where I separate the core files and application files, as follows:
/root |-- /Src |-- /App |-- /Model |-- ** (Application Entities) ** |-- /Core |-- /Model |-- ** (Core Entities) **In the Doctrine documentation shows the following form to set 1 directory for Esntitys: $config = Setup::createAnnotationMetadataConfiguration(array(__DIR__. "/src"), $isDevMode);But when I have to configure more than one directory that will contain the Entitys of my application, how to proceed? Thanks in advance! I am stumped as to why this simple code will not work...anyone care to enlighten me? <? namespace test; class testClass { function go() { echo "hello world"; } } $x='testClass'; $t = new $x(); $t->go(); ?> Running that code gives me this error: Fatal error: Class 'testClass' not found in test.php on line 11 If I remove the namespace declaration it works fine...anyone? Is it possible to have a class access another class it its parent directory without using a fully qualified name? While the following script is not valid, it is how I would have thought it would be done should it be possible. If it is not possible, I expect there is a good reason why one would not want to do so, and would appreciate your thoughts why that is so. Thanks // src/PrimaryTopic/SubTopic/SubSubTopic/ParentClass.php namespace PrimaryTopic\SubTopic\SubSubTopic; class ParentClass {} // src/PrimaryTopic/SubTopic/SubSubTopic/Child/ChildClass1.php namespace PrimaryTopic\SubTopic\SubSubTopic\Child; class ChildClass1 extends ..\ParentClass {} // src/PrimaryTopic/SubTopic/SubSubTopic/Child/ChildClass2.php namespace PrimaryTopic\SubTopic\SubSubTopic\Child; class ChildClass2 extends ..\ParentClass {}
I am doing something stupid, and just can't see it and hoping someone has better eyes than mine. I have two Doctrine entities which extend another class using single class inheritance, but when retrieving the collection of either of the two child classes, I get the collection of the parent (i.e. combination of both child classes). I've experimented with making the parent abstract and not including it in the discriminator map but no change. In hopes to identifying my mistake, I created a new Symfony project with just the relevant classes and show all steps below. Initial install by running the following: symfony new test composer update composer require doctrine/orm composer require migrations composer require maker --dev composer require security Using "php bin/console make:user", I created three users: AbstractUser, OwnerUser, VendorUser. I then edited all three entities and the owner and vendor repositories as follows: <?php namespace App\Entity; use App\Repository\AbstractUserRepository; use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM; use Symfony\Component\Security\Core\User\UserInterface; /** * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=AbstractUserRepository::class) * @ORM\InheritanceType("SINGLE_TABLE") * @ORM\DiscriminatorColumn(name="discr", type="string") * @ORM\DiscriminatorMap({"owner" = "OwnerUser", "vendor" = "VendorUser", "abstract" = "AbstractUser"}) */ class AbstractUser implements UserInterface { // No changes made }
<?php namespace App\Entity; use App\Repository\OwnerUserRepository; use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM; /** * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=OwnerUserRepository::class) */ class OwnerUser extends AbstractUser { }
<?php namespace App\Entity; use App\Repository\VendorUserRepository; use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM; /** * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=VendorUserRepository::class) */ class VendorUser extends AbstractUser { } No change to AbstractUserRepository. <?php namespace App\Repository; class OwnerUserRepository extends AbstractUserRepository { }
<?php namespace App\Repository; class VendorUserRepository extends AbstractUserRepository { } Then I migrated the DB. php bin/console doctrine:schema:drop --full-database --force rm migrations/* php bin/console make:migration php bin/console doctrine:migrations:migrate Next I created two OwnerUsers and one VendorUser using a command script I wrote shown at the end of this post. # php bin/console app:tester create OwnerUser roles=[] # php bin/console app:tester create OwnerUser roles=[] # php bin/console app:tester create VendorUser roles=[] Checked the PostSQL database. facdocs=> \d List of relations Schema | Name | Type | Owner --------+-----------------------------+----------+--------- public | abstract_user | table | facdocs public | abstract_user_id_seq | sequence | facdocs public | doctrine_migration_versions | table | facdocs (3 rows) facdocs=> select * from abstract_user; id | email | roles | password | discr ----+-------------+-------+----------------+-------- 1 | setEmail158 | [] | setPassword146 | owner 2 | setEmail87 | [] | setPassword101 | owner 3 | setEmail62 | [] | setPassword20 | vendor (3 rows) facdocs=>
Next, I retrieved the entities using Doctrine along with the beforementioned test script. [michael@devserver test]$ php bin/console app:tester read VendorUser Test Entity Manager ============ command: read entity: VendorUser class: \App\Entity\VendorUser properties: [] array(3) { [0]=> object(stdClass)#293 (5) { ["__CLASS__"]=> string(20) "App\Entity\OwnerUser" ["id:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> int(1) ["email:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(11) "setEmail158" ["roles:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(8) "Array(0)" ["password:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(14) "setPassword146" } [1]=> object(stdClass)#294 (5) { ["__CLASS__"]=> string(20) "App\Entity\OwnerUser" ["id:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> int(2) ["email:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(10) "setEmail87" ["roles:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(8) "Array(0)" ["password:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(14) "setPassword101" } [2]=> object(stdClass)#358 (5) { ["__CLASS__"]=> string(21) "App\Entity\VendorUser" ["id:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> int(3) ["email:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(10) "setEmail62" ["roles:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(8) "Array(0)" ["password:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(13) "setPassword20" } } [michael@devserver test]$ [michael@devserver test]$ php bin/console app:tester read OwnerUser Test Entity Manager ============ command: read entity: OwnerUser class: \App\Entity\OwnerUser properties: [] array(3) { [0]=> object(stdClass)#293 (5) { ["__CLASS__"]=> string(20) "App\Entity\OwnerUser" ["id:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> int(1) ["email:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(11) "setEmail158" ["roles:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(8) "Array(0)" ["password:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(14) "setPassword146" } [1]=> object(stdClass)#294 (5) { ["__CLASS__"]=> string(20) "App\Entity\OwnerUser" ["id:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> int(2) ["email:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(10) "setEmail87" ["roles:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(8) "Array(0)" ["password:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(14) "setPassword101" } [2]=> object(stdClass)#358 (5) { ["__CLASS__"]=> string(21) "App\Entity\VendorUser" ["id:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> int(3) ["email:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(10) "setEmail62" ["roles:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(8) "Array(0)" ["password:App\Entity\AbstractUser:private"]=> string(13) "setPassword20" } } [michael@devserver test]$
As seen, when requesting a collection of either OwnerUsers or VendorUsers, I am retrieving the combination of both collections. I am sure it is totally user (i.e. me) error, but just don't see it. Are you able to see my stupid mistake? Thanks
<?php namespace App\Command; use Symfony\Component\Console\Command\Command; use Symfony\Component\Console\Input\InputInterface; use Symfony\Component\Console\Output\OutputInterface; use Symfony\Component\Console\Input\InputArgument; use Doctrine\ORM\EntityManagerInterface; use Doctrine\Common\Util\Debug; class Tester extends Command { // the name of the command (the part after "bin/console") protected static $defaultName = 'app:tester'; private $entityManager; public function __construct(EntityManagerInterface $entityManager) { $this->entityManager = $entityManager; parent::__construct(); } protected function configure() { $this ->setDescription('Doctrine Object Tester. --help') ->setHelp('This command allows you to query a single entity...') ->addArgument('cmd', InputArgument::REQUIRED, 'The command name [create, read].') ->addArgument('entity', InputArgument::REQUIRED, 'The name of the entity.') ->addArgument('properties', InputArgument::IS_ARRAY | InputArgument::OPTIONAL, 'properies (foo=foo bla=[]') ; } private function getProperties($input) { $properties=[]; foreach($input as $property) { $property=explode('=', $property); $name = trim($property[0]); $value = trim($property[1]); if($value === '[]') { $value = []; } elseif($value === 'null') { $value = null; } elseif(substr($value, 0, 1) === '/') { $value = explode('/', substr($value, 1)); $class = ucfirst(substr($value[0], 0, -1)); $class = '\App\Entity\\'.$class; if(count($value)===1) { $value = $this->entityManager->getRepository($class)->findAll(); } else { $value = $this->entityManager->getRepository($class)->find($value[1]); } } $properties[$name] = $value; } return $properties; } protected function execute(InputInterface $input, OutputInterface $output) { $output->writeln([ 'Test Entity Manager', '============', '', ]); // retrieve the argument value using getArgument() $cmd = $input->getArgument('cmd'); $output->writeln('command: '.$cmd); $entity = $input->getArgument('entity'); $output->writeln('entity: '.$entity); $class = '\App\Entity\\'.$entity; $output->writeln('class: '.$class); $properties = $this->getProperties($input->getArgument('properties')); $output->writeln('properties: '.json_encode($properties)); switch($cmd) { case 'create': $entity = new $class; foreach(get_class_methods($entity) as $method) { if(substr($method, 0, 3)==='set') { $m = lcfirst(substr($method, 3)); $entity->$method(array_key_exists($m, $properties)?$properties[$m]:$method.rand(0,200)); } } $this->entityManager->persist($entity); $this->entityManager->flush(); $output->writeln('entity created'); break; case 'read': Debug::dump($this->entityManager->getRepository($class)->findAll()); break; default: $output->writeln('INVALID COMMAND: '.$cmd.'. Only create and read are supported.'); } return Command::SUCCESS; } }
Finally getting around to giving Doctrine a try. Looks like YAML is depreciated, so my choices are DocBlocks or XML. I am sure it is personal choice, however, I would like to start off with what most feel is the best path. Any recommendations? Thanks Anyone know why the following results in an error? Not a big deal as memory is not an issue and I can (and have) just changed it to create a new array instead of using a generator, but still curious. Thanks <?php foreach($doctrineCollection as $doctrineEntity){ yield new MyWrapper($doctrineEntity); /* After around 4 iterations, results in the following error: syslog Apr 06 15:25:25 myserver.net kernel: php-fpm[42889]: segfault at 7f8156a14100 ip 000055bb1d79acfd sp 00007ffd0b50a968 error 4 in php-fpm[55bb1d47c000+46e000] /var/log/php-fpm/error.log [Mon Apr 06 20:06:38.781360 2020] [proxy_fcgi:error] [pid 1501:tid 140210423629568] (104)Connection reset by peer: [client 12.345.67.890:45574] AH01075: Error dispatching request to : /var/log/httpd/error_log [06-Apr-2020 20:04:52] WARNING: [pool michael] child 5524 exited on signal 11 (SIGSEGV) after 0.138268 seconds from start [06-Apr-2020 20:04:52] NOTICE: [pool michael] child 5526 started */ } class MyWrapper { private $doctrineEntity; public function __construct($doctrineEntity) { $this->doctrineEntity=$doctrineEntity; } }
I am assuming doing the following is bad practice as the short name "Account" is both for the repository and account. Agree? Appears that use always takes precedent over namespace and just Account\User is always short for \NotionCommotion\Domain\Entity\Account\User and not \NotionCommotion\Api\Account\User. Still sees like it could easily result in confusion. namespace NotionCommotion\Domain\Repository\Account; use NotionCommotion\Domain\Entity\Account; class AccountRepository { public function getUser(string $mainKey, int $userId):?Account\User { // } } Would it be better to do something like the following? Interestingly, it worked fine on the below class but when I tried to do so on the above AccountRepository class, it resulted in AccountDir\User class not found error. Is there any logic reason why that might/should happen, or is it more likely I just have some error elsewhere? namespace NotionCommotion\Api\Account; use NotionCommotion\Domain\Entity\Account as AccountDir; class AccountService { public function read():AccountDir\Account { // } } php74 is installed as my primary php, but I am also working with a different framework that can only use php73 and set up a separate pool to deal with it. Recently, my installed composer1 told me I should upgrade to composer2 and I did so, but then found that the previously mentioned other framework also doesn't work with composer2 but only composer1. When updating a package with composer, sometimes I get composer errors or even worse no composer errors but PHP errors later on where classes don't exist, and I think it relates to using the wrong version of PHP (and maybe even composer). Is it always required to consistently use composer with a single version of PHP? Anything to worry about different versions of composer or will I just get a message. Any other best practices? Any issues how I set up composer below? Thanks! curl -sS https://getcomposer.org/installer | php # or if desired, use resulting composer.phar as: $ php (or php73) composer.phar update/install/etc chmod +x composer.phar sudo mv composer.phar /usr/local/bin/composer sudo ln -s /usr/local/bin/composer /usr/local/bin/composer2 curl -sS https://getcomposer.org/installer | php73 chmod +x composer.phar sudo mv composer.phar /usr/local/bin/composer2_73 php -r "copy('https://getcomposer.org/installer', 'composer-setup.php');" php -r "if (hash_file('sha384', 'composer-setup.php') === '756890a4488ce9024fc62c56153228907f1545c228516cbf63f885e036d37e9a59d27d63f46af1d4d07ee0f76181c7d3') { echo 'Installer verified'; } else { echo 'Installer corrupt'; unlink('composer-setup.php'); } echo PHP_EOL;" php composer-setup.php --version=1.10.19 chmod +x composer.phar sudo mv composer.phar /usr/local/bin/composer1 php73 composer-setup.php --version=1.10.19 chmod +x composer.phar sudo mv composer.phar /usr/local/bin/composer1_73 rm composer-setup.php
I'm beginning to study Composer and am developing a system where I separate the files core application files, as follows:
/root |-- /src |-- /App |-- /DBConfig |-- /Controller |-- /Model |-- /Core |-- /Helper |-- /Controller |-- /ModelSo, to set this setting in composer.json file and get access to all classes both /App much /Core would be this way? "autoload" : { "psr-X" : { "App\\" : "/src", "Core\\" : "/src" } }Or is there a more correct way? I have also read about PSR-0 vs PSR-4 and I am still somewhat in doubt which one to use. In my case what should I implement, PSR-0 or PSR-4? Hi.
My sys admin guy has informed me that installing composer is unlikely. They're a bit jumpy about security around here.
I tried to download and run Laravel on it's own but I'm getting errors when I go to http://example.com/t...laravel/public/
Warning: require(/var/www/html/test/laravel/bootstrap/../vendor/autoload.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/html/test/laravel/bootstrap/autoload.php on line 17 Fatal error: require(): Failed opening required '/var/www/html/test/laravel/bootstrap/../vendor/autoload.php' (include_path='.:/php/includes:/var/www/html/php/includes:/jpa/release/jpa/includes:/usr/share/pear:/usr/share/php/phpmailer:/apache/htdocs/applications/surveys/Includes:/var/lib/ZF1/library') in /var/www/html/test/laravel/bootstrap/autoload.php on line 17I'm very new to Laravel and I am basically assuming that the reason for these errors is because i haven't installed all the various dependancies. And that you can only install all the dependancies through Composer. Is this the case? I downloaded the Laravel framework from GitHub Unfortunately.. My only real experience of PHP Frameworks is CodeIgniter. So I've never expoled/used "packages" or "dependancies" and don't really know where they are, or where they go, or what they do! I managed to get Laravel up and running on my personal computer (using Composer).... But, as I've said, I might not be able to do this on my day job server. Any tips? ----- Update ----- Is there a chance I am just misunderstanding the word "Dependancies"? It's not a word I often use. Does it just mean "The PHP files that make up the Laravel Framework"? Edited by Korferer, 19 November 2014 - 08:11 AM. Quick question about the dependency manager Composer with PHP. I have it installed and am pulling in a few libraries, it works pretty well as far as I can tell. I have a question that might be dumb, so I apologize in advance. When connecting to your application it's still required to use the lines similar to the following? <script src="vendor/components/jquery/jquery.min.js"></script> <link rel="stylesheet" href="vendor/twbs/bootstrap/dist/css/bootstrap.css" > Also I'm trying to figure out how to install the x3dom library, but cannot get composer to do it. (https://www.x3dom.org/) |